Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 500-420 Exam - Topic 1 Question 39 Discussion

A Performance Analyst has enabled Development Level Monitoring for an application. For a default configuration, in which scenario will Development Level Monitoring get automatically disabled?
A) A maximum of 500 calls per minute limit is exceeded, and Maximum heap utilization percentage goes above 90%
B) A maximum of 1500 calls per minute limit is exceeded, and Maximum heap utilization percentage goes above 90%
C) A maximum of 1000 calls per minute limit is exceeded, and Maximum heap utilization percentage goes above 95%
D) A maximum of 2000 calls per minute limit is exceeded, and Maximum heap utilization percentage goes above 95%

Cisco 500-420 Exam - Topic 1 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-420 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 1
[All 500-420 Questions]

A Performance Analyst has enabled Development Level Monitoring for an application. For a default configuration, in which scenario will Development Level Monitoring get automatically disabled?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Development Level Monitoring in AppDynamics is designed for use in a lower volume, non-production environment. For a default configuration, Development Level Monitoring will get automatically disabled if the monitored environment exceeds a threshold, typically a maximum of 1000 calls per minute, and the Maximum heap utilization percentage goes above 95%. These thresholds are in place to prevent excessive overhead in a production environment where such detailed monitoring could impact performance.


AppDynamics documentation on Agent Configuration: Provides information on configuration settings for monitoring levels, including when Development Level Monitoring is automatically disabled due to exceeding thresholds.

by Shawnee at Aug 14, 2025, 02:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carin
8 months ago
No way, C is the right answer, 1000 is too low.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
8 months ago
Surprised it's not higher, 2000 calls seems like a lot!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
8 months ago
I think it's actually B, 1500 seems more reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherron
9 months ago
It's definitely A, those limits are pretty strict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
9 months ago
I agree with A, those thresholds are crucial for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
9 months ago
I recall that exceeding 1500 calls per minute is significant, but I can't remember if that's the right limit for disabling monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the exact thresholds. Was it 90% or 95% for heap utilization in the default config?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the heap utilization percentage is crucial here. Maybe it’s option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
10 months ago
I think I remember something about the limits, but I’m not sure if it’s 1000 or 1500 calls per minute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The question is asking about the specific conditions that would cause Development Level Monitoring to be automatically disabled. I need to look for the option that mentions both a call volume limit and a heap utilization percentage that exceed the thresholds. Let me double-check the details in each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The wording is a bit tricky, and I'm not entirely sure I understand the concept of Development Level Monitoring and when it gets disabled. I'll need to re-read the question and options a few times to make sure I'm on the right track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
11 months ago
I think I've got this one. The key is to look for the combination of call volume and heap utilization that exceeds the limits, triggering the automatic disabling of Development Level Monitoring. I'll carefully consider each option and choose the one that best matches that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
11 months ago
Okay, let me see here. The question is asking about the scenario where Development Level Monitoring gets disabled, so I need to focus on the conditions that would trigger that. Looks like it's related to call volume and heap utilization, but I'm not sure which specific thresholds would cause it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like it's testing my understanding of when Development Level Monitoring gets automatically disabled. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the conditions mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
12 months ago
This question is so easy, I'm pretty sure a monkey could figure it out. I'm going with C, just to keep things simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
12 months ago
Lol, I bet the developers who set this up were like, 'Let's make it super easy to trigger the disable, that way we don't have to deal with the monitoring!' Option C for the win!
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
8 months ago
Can't believe they set the limits so low!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
8 months ago
Option C does seem like an easy trigger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
9 months ago
I think they just wanted to avoid extra work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
9 months ago
Haha, right? They really made it a challenge!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
1 year ago
As a performance analyst, I'd say B is the correct answer. 1500 calls per minute and 90% heap utilization is a reasonable threshold to automatically disable the monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
1 year ago
I'm going with D. 2000 calls per minute and 95% heap utilization seems more realistic for a default configuration, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
1 year ago
Hmm, I think it's option C. Exceeding 1000 calls per minute and 95% heap utilization sounds like a pretty good trigger to disable Development Level Monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
Joanna
11 months ago
User3: I agree, those conditions would definitely warrant disabling Development Level Monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
11 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. Those thresholds seem reasonable for automatic disabling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
12 months ago
User2: Yeah, exceeding 1000 calls per minute and 95% heap utilization seems like a reasonable threshold.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
12 months ago
User1: I think it's option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
12 months ago
User 1: I think it's option C. Exceeding 1000 calls per minute and 95% heap utilization sounds like a good trigger to disable Development Level Monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenny
1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel