Cisco Exam 500-285 Topic 1 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-285 exam

Question #: 68
Topic #: 1

[All 500-285 Questions]

What does the whitelist attribute value "not evaluated" indicate?

AThe host is not a target of the whitelist.

BThe host could not be evaluated because no profile exists for it.

CThe whitelist status could not be updated because the correlation policy it belongs to is not enabled.

DThe host is not on a monitored network segment.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Ernest at Sep 13, 2024, 05:12 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-285 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Aleshia

7 months ago

I'm going to whitelist my joke here: 'Why did the network admin cross the road? To get to the other side of the firewall!'

upvoted 0 times

...

Sang

7 months ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is B. No profile means the host couldn't be evaluated.

upvoted 0 times

Kathrine

6 months ago

Yeah, if there's no profile, it can't be evaluated. Option B is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karima

6 months ago

That makes sense. It must be option B then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

6 months ago

I think you're right. No profile means it couldn't be evaluated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teresita

7 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) The host is not on a monitored network segment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marcelle

7 months ago

I agree with Wayne, it makes sense that 'not evaluated' means there is no profile for the host.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlene

7 months ago

Hmm, this is tricky. I'm leaning towards D - the host is not on a monitored network segment.

upvoted 0 times

Lilli

6 months ago

D) The host is not on a monitored network segment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nana

6 months ago

C) The whitelist status could not be updated because the correlation policy it belongs to is not enabled.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernadine

6 months ago

B) The host could not be evaluated because no profile exists for it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dan

7 months ago

A) The host is not a target of the whitelist.

upvoted 0 times

...

France

7 months ago

I'm going with C. The whitelist status couldn't be updated because the policy it belongs to is disabled.

upvoted 0 times

Mitzie

6 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it might be A. The host is not a target of the whitelist.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassi

6 months ago

I agree with you, B seems like the correct option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clorinda

7 months ago

I think it's B. The host couldn't be evaluated because no profile exists for it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefan

7 months ago

I think the answer is B. The host couldn't be evaluated because there's no profile for it.

upvoted 0 times

Lenna

6 months ago

So, it's crucial to have profiles set up for all hosts on the whitelist.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamie

6 months ago

Yes, without a profile, the host's status can't be determined.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elroy

7 months ago

That makes sense. It's important to have profiles for accurate evaluation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

7 months ago

I think the answer is B. The host couldn't be evaluated because there's no profile for it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Royce

7 months ago

Yes, if there's no profile for the host, it makes sense that it couldn't be evaluated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariann

7 months ago

I agree, option B seems to be the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wayne

7 months ago

I think the answer is B) The host could not be evaluated because no profile exists for it.

upvoted 0 times

...