Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 500-220 Exam - Topic 4 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 4
[All 500-220 Questions]

Which design requirement is met by implementing syslog versus SNMP?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Implementing syslog versus SNMP can meet the design requirement of gathering information such as flows and client connectivity. Syslog can collect and report various types of events, such as VPN connectivity, uplink connectivity, DHCP leases, firewall rules, IDS alerts, and security events. Syslog can also provide detailed information about the flows and client connectivity on the network devices, such as source and destination IP addresses, ports, protocols, bytes transferred, etc. SNMP, on the other hand, can collect and report various statistics and information about the network devices, such as CPU utilization, interface status, memory usage, etc. However, SNMP does not provide as much information about the flows and client connectivity as syslog does.


Meraki_Device_Reporting_-_Syslog%2C_SNMP%2C_and_API

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Reena
3 months ago
Automation capabilities? I don't see that with syslog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
3 months ago
C is definitely the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
3 months ago
I think SNMP is better for proactive alerts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
4 months ago
Syslog is great for logging events!
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
4 months ago
Wait, I thought syslog was just for logs, not alerts?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D since syslog deals with event logging and SNMP is more about gathering metrics. But I could be wrong!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
4 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question like this before. Could it be about organization-wide information collection? That sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
5 months ago
I remember something about proactive alerts being a key feature of SNMP. Maybe that's the right choice here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
5 months ago
I think syslog is more about logging events, while SNMP is for monitoring. I’m not sure which design requirement fits best though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
5 months ago
I'm still a bit confused on the automation capabilities of each. Maybe I should review the differences between syslog and SNMP before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
5 months ago
Good point, Rasheeda. And syslog is more for collecting organization-wide information, so I think C might be the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards B - SNMP is better for generating proactive alerts since it can monitor specific thresholds and events in real-time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. Syslog is for logging system events, while SNMP is for monitoring network devices. The key is to identify which design requirement each one meets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the differences between syslog and SNMP before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
9 months ago
Option B seems like a no-brainer to me. Proactive alerts are the difference between a crisis and a well-oiled machine.
upvoted 0 times
Mozelle
8 months ago
SNMP is more for collecting organization-wide information, while syslog is better for generating alerts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
9 months ago
Syslog is great for generating those proactive alerts when something critical happens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
9 months ago
Definitely, having alerts for critical events can save a lot of time and prevent major problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
9 months ago
I agree, proactive alerts are crucial for staying ahead of issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luis
9 months ago
Hold up, are we sure we can't just hack the mainframe and get all the info we need? Oh, wait, that's not an option. Dang it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards Option A. Automation capabilities are the real power move in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Thersa
9 months ago
Definitely, automation can make a big difference in managing the system efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
9 months ago
I agree, automation is key in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
9 months ago
Option A) when automation capabilities are needed
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Frank
10 months ago
I'd say Option C is the winner here. Collecting organization-wide information is crucial for getting the big picture.
upvoted 0 times
Filiberto
9 months ago
I agree, organization-wide information is key for making informed decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
9 months ago
Option C is definitely important for getting a complete view of the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delmy
10 months ago
I believe syslog is better for collecting organization-wide information, so C) could also be a valid answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
10 months ago
Option B is the way to go! Proactive alerts are essential for keeping a close eye on those critical events.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
9 months ago
It's important to have a system in place that can generate alerts for critical events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
9 months ago
Definitely, having those alerts can help prevent issues before they escalate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
9 months ago
I agree, proactive alerts are crucial for staying on top of critical events.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colene
11 months ago
But what about option C) when organization-wide information must be collected?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
11 months ago
I agree with Ronna, SNMP is more suitable for that requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) when proactive alerts for critical events must be generated.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel