Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 500-220 Exam - Topic 3 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam

Question #: 64
Topic #: 3

[All 500-220 Questions]

What is a feature of distributed Layer 3 roaming?

AAn MX Security Appliance is not required as a concentrator.

BAn MX Security Appliance is required as a concentrator.

CAll wireless client traffic can be split-tunneled.

DAll wireless client traffic is tunneled.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Tammy at Jul 13, 2024, 07:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-220 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Penney

9 months ago

Really? All traffic split-tunneled? That seems too good to be true.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timmy

9 months ago

C is interesting, split-tunneling is a game changer!

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

10 months ago

Wait, are you sure about A? I thought an MX was needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharee

10 months ago

Totally agree, A makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sean

10 months ago

A is correct, no MX needed for that!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenora

10 months ago

I remember discussing split-tunneling in class, but I can't remember if it specifically applies to wireless clients in this context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quiana

11 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the tunneling options. I thought all traffic was tunneled, but I can't recall if that applies to distributed Layer 3 roaming.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meaghan

11 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I feel like option A might be correct since it mentions not needing the MX as a concentrator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisha

11 months ago

I think I remember that an MX Security Appliance isn't always necessary for distributed Layer 3 roaming, but I'm not completely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

11 months ago

Okay, I've got this. Distributed Layer 3 roaming means the wireless clients can move between access points without having to re-authenticate or re-establish their connection. The question is asking about a key feature of this, so I'll need to think through the options carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Royce

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between distributed Layer 3 roaming and other types of roaming. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the specifics of this concept.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

11 months ago

I'm pretty sure this has to do with how wireless clients connect to the network when they move between access points. I think the key is whether the traffic is tunneled or split-tunneled.

upvoted 0 times

...

Percy

11 months ago

This seems straightforward. The answer has to be either A or B - whether an MX Security Appliance is required as a concentrator or not. I'll eliminate the other options and focus on those two.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

11 months ago

The schedule baseline seems like the most logical choice here. It's the documented plan that you can measure actual progress against during the project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annelle

1 year ago

Distributed Layer 3 roaming? More like distributed layer of confusion, am I right? Let's just tunnel our way to victory!

upvoted 0 times

Tawna

1 year ago

I'm pretty sure it's B) An MX Security Appliance is required as a concentrator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candida

1 year ago

Actually, I think it's C) All wireless client traffic can be split-tunneled.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laquanda

1 year ago

No, I believe it's A) An MX Security Appliance is not required as a concentrator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luann

1 year ago

I think the answer is D) All wireless client traffic is tunneled.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Yolando

1 year ago

I'm going with D. Everything gets tunneled, no exceptions. Secure as a vault, baby!

upvoted 0 times

Rodolfo

1 year ago

I agree with you, D is the safest choice. Can't go wrong with tunneling everything.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kathryn

1 year ago

I disagree, I think C is the better option. Split-tunneling can be more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annamaria

1 year ago

I think D is the way to go. Can't be too careful with security.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Lenna

1 year ago

C is the answer. All wireless client traffic can be split-tunneled, allowing for more efficient and secure data transmission. Doesn't get much better than that!

upvoted 0 times

Raymon

1 year ago

A) An MX Security Appliance is not required as a concentrator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aaron

1 year ago

That's right! Split-tunneling is definitely a great feature for distributed Layer 3 roaming.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassandra

1 year ago

C) All wireless client traffic can be split-tunneled.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Christiane

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm going with B. An MX Security Appliance is definitely needed as a concentrator for distributed Layer 3 roaming. Gotta have that centralized control, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Melinda

1 year ago

Yeah, having that concentrator is key for distributed Layer 3 roaming. Can't do without it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karima

1 year ago

I agree, B is the correct answer. The MX Security Appliance is necessary for centralized control.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

King

1 year ago

I think option A is correct. Distributed Layer 3 roaming doesn't require an MX Security Appliance as a concentrator. That's a key feature of this technology.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think C) All wireless client traffic can be split-tunneled could also be a valid option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

1 year ago

I agree with Kristal, because without a concentrator, how can the roaming work effectively?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristal

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) An MX Security Appliance is required as a concentrator.

upvoted 0 times

...