MENU
What is a feature of distributed Layer 3 roaming?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 500-220 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
PE
Penney
11 months ago
Really? All traffic split-tunneled? That seems too good to be true.
TI
Timmy
11 months ago
C is interesting, split-tunneling is a game changer!
VI
Viola
11 months ago
Wait, are you sure about A? I thought an MX was needed.
SH
Sharee
11 months ago
Totally agree, A makes sense.
SE
Sean
12 months ago
A is correct, no MX needed for that!
EL
Elenora
12 months ago
I remember discussing split-tunneling in class, but I can't remember if it specifically applies to wireless clients in this context.
QU
Quiana
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the tunneling options. I thought all traffic was tunneled, but I can't recall if that applies to distributed Layer 3 roaming.
ME
Meaghan
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like option A might be correct since it mentions not needing the MX as a concentrator.
LI
Lisha
1 year ago
I think I remember that an MX Security Appliance isn't always necessary for distributed Layer 3 roaming, but I'm not completely sure.
LA
Larae
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. Distributed Layer 3 roaming means the wireless clients can move between access points without having to re-authenticate or re-establish their connection. The question is asking about a key feature of this, so I'll need to think through the options carefully.
RO
Royce
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between distributed Layer 3 roaming and other types of roaming. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the specifics of this concept.
DI
Dick
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure this has to do with how wireless clients connect to the network when they move between access points. I think the key is whether the traffic is tunneled or split-tunneled.
PE
Percy
1 year ago
This seems straightforward. The answer has to be either A or B - whether an MX Security Appliance is required as a concentrator or not. I'll eliminate the other options and focus on those two.
NO
Nobuko
1 year ago
The schedule baseline seems like the most logical choice here. It's the documented plan that you can measure actual progress against during the project.
AN
Annelle
1 year ago
Distributed Layer 3 roaming? More like distributed layer of confusion, am I right? Let's just tunnel our way to victory!
TA
Tawna
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure it's B) An MX Security Appliance is required as a concentrator.
CA
Candida
1 year ago
Actually, I think it's C) All wireless client traffic can be split-tunneled.
LA
Laquanda
1 year ago
No, I believe it's A) An MX Security Appliance is not required as a concentrator.
LU
Luann
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) All wireless client traffic is tunneled.
YO
Yolando
1 year ago
I'm going with D. Everything gets tunneled, no exceptions. Secure as a vault, baby!
RO
Rodolfo
1 year ago
I agree with you, D is the safest choice. Can't go wrong with tunneling everything.
KA
Kathryn
1 year ago
I disagree, I think C is the better option. Split-tunneling can be more efficient.
AN
Annamaria
1 year ago
I think D is the way to go. Can't be too careful with security.
LE
Lenna
1 year ago
C is the answer. All wireless client traffic can be split-tunneled, allowing for more efficient and secure data transmission. Doesn't get much better than that!
RA
Raymon
1 year ago
A) An MX Security Appliance is not required as a concentrator.
AA
Aaron
1 year ago
That's right! Split-tunneling is definitely a great feature for distributed Layer 3 roaming.
CA
Cassandra
1 year ago
C) All wireless client traffic can be split-tunneled.
CH
Christiane
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm going with B. An MX Security Appliance is definitely needed as a concentrator for distributed Layer 3 roaming. Gotta have that centralized control, you know?
ME
Melinda
1 year ago
Yeah, having that concentrator is key for distributed Layer 3 roaming. Can't do without it.
KA
Karima
1 year ago
I agree, B is the correct answer. The MX Security Appliance is necessary for centralized control.
KI
King
2 years ago
I think option A is correct. Distributed Layer 3 roaming doesn't require an MX Security Appliance as a concentrator. That's a key feature of this technology.
AR
Arlette
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) All wireless client traffic can be split-tunneled could also be a valid option.
SH
Shenika
2 years ago
I agree with Kristal, because without a concentrator, how can the roaming work effectively?
KR
Kristal
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) An MX Security Appliance is required as a concentrator.