Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 500-220 Exam - Topic 2 Question 75 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.What are two outcomes reflected in the Web App Health application? (Choose two.)
D) Network #2 could not load Google because of a local client misconfiguration.
A) Users on both networks may be experiencing issues when attempting to reach Google.
B) Network #1 could not load Google because of a remote server issue.
C) Network #2 had better application performance than Network #1.
E) Neither network recorded any server-side performance issues.

Cisco 500-220 Exam - Topic 2 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 2
[All 500-220 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

What are two outcomes reflected in the Web App Health application? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!clone-organization


by Mignon at Jan 14, 2025, 04:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-220 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Julio
9 months ago
I’m surprised neither network had server-side issues!
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
9 months ago
I think Network #2's performance was better overall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
10 months ago
Wait, how can Network #2 perform better if it couldn't load Google?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
10 months ago
Totally agree, I saw that too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
10 months ago
Network #1 had issues loading Google.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the server-side issues. I thought option E was a possibility, but it seems too straightforward based on what we studied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
11 months ago
I feel like option C could be right too, especially if Network #2 had better performance. We discussed performance comparisons in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about local client misconfigurations being a common issue. Maybe option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
11 months ago
I think option A might be correct since it mentions issues for users on both networks, which sounds familiar from our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
11 months ago
This is a tricky one. There are a lot of details in the image and the answer choices, and I want to make sure I don't miss anything important. I'll take my time and really analyze each option before making my selections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The image shows that Network #1 was having issues loading Google, while Network #2 was performing better. I'll select the two answers that best reflect that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
11 months ago
Hmm, the image shows some performance data for two different networks, but I'm not sure exactly what it's telling me. I'll need to read through the answer choices carefully to try to figure out the right ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
11 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about interpreting the information in the Web App Health application. I'll carefully review the details in the image and the answer choices to determine the two correct outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
1 year ago
Hey, I know this one! The answer is definitely B and D. Network #1 had a remote server issue, and Network #2 had a local client misconfiguration. Easy peasy! *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Mollie
1 year ago
Good job on knowing the answer! It's important to troubleshoot these issues to ensure smooth application performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
1 year ago
Yes, that's correct. Network #1 had a remote server issue, and Network #2 had a local client misconfiguration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
1 year ago
So, both networks were experiencing issues with loading Google.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 year ago
I think you're right! Network #1 had a remote server issue and Network #2 had a local client misconfiguration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Natalie
1 year ago
Oof, this is a head-scratcher. I'm going to go with C and E - the performance difference between the networks is clear, and the lack of server-side problems is a good clue.
upvoted 0 times
Sabra
1 year ago
I think those are the correct outcomes reflected in the Web App Health application. Good choices!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
1 year ago
Yeah, it makes sense that Network #2 had better performance since it didn't have any server-side issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
1 year ago
I agree with you, C and E seem like the most logical choices based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joni
1 year ago
This is a tricky one! I'm going to guess A and C. The users on both networks seem to be experiencing issues reaching Google, and Network #2 did show better performance.
upvoted 0 times
Sena
1 year ago
I would go with A and C as well, it makes sense based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
1 year ago
I agree, it looks like users on both networks are having trouble with Google and Network #2 performed better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
1 year ago
I think you're right, A and C seem to be the correct outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
1 year ago
Interesting... I'm thinking B and D might be the right answers. The remote server issue for Network #1 and the local misconfiguration for Network #2 seem to align with the data.
upvoted 0 times
Ivan
1 year ago
Yes, it looks like those are the most likely outcomes based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
1 year ago
I agree, B and D make sense based on the data shown.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lawana
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards C and E. The performance metrics show Network #2 had better results, and the lack of server-side issues suggests the problems were on the client-side.
upvoted 0 times
Jaclyn
1 year ago
Looks like we're on the same page then!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
1 year ago
So, it seems like both C and E are correct outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
1 year ago
But don't forget that neither network recorded any server-side performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
1 year ago
I agree, Network #2 did have better application performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eleonora
1 year ago
But the exhibit clearly shows that Network #2 had better application performance than Network #1, so C must be one of the outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
1 year ago
I think the outcomes reflected are A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel