Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 500-220 Exam - Topic 2 Question 75 Discussion

Posted by Mignon on Jan 14, 2025 at 04:57 PM

Refer to the exhibit.

What are two outcomes reflected in the Web App Health application? (Choose two.)

Get Premium 500-220 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
JU
Julio 11 months ago
I’m surprised neither network had server-side issues!
XO
Xochitl 11 months ago
I think Network #2's performance was better overall.
YU
Yuriko 11 months ago
Wait, how can Network #2 perform better if it couldn't load Google?
RA
Raymon 11 months ago
Totally agree, I saw that too!
TI
Tiffiny 12 months ago
Network #1 had issues loading Google.
OL
Oliva 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the server-side issues. I thought option E was a possibility, but it seems too straightforward based on what we studied.
PA
Patria 1 year ago
I feel like option C could be right too, especially if Network #2 had better performance. We discussed performance comparisons in class.
WI
William 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about local client misconfigurations being a common issue. Maybe option D?
RE
Renea 1 year ago
I think option A might be correct since it mentions issues for users on both networks, which sounds familiar from our practice questions.
PE
Peggie 1 year ago
This is a tricky one. There are a lot of details in the image and the answer choices, and I want to make sure I don't miss anything important. I'll take my time and really analyze each option before making my selections.
DE
Denny 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The image shows that Network #1 was having issues loading Google, while Network #2 was performing better. I'll select the two answers that best reflect that.
JO
Johna 1 year ago
Hmm, the image shows some performance data for two different networks, but I'm not sure exactly what it's telling me. I'll need to read through the answer choices carefully to try to figure out the right ones.
MA
Margart 1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about interpreting the information in the Web App Health application. I'll carefully review the details in the image and the answer choices to determine the two correct outcomes.
LE
Leslee 1 year ago
Hey, I know this one! The answer is definitely B and D. Network #1 had a remote server issue, and Network #2 had a local client misconfiguration. Easy peasy! *winks*
MO
Mollie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leslee
Good job on knowing the answer! It's important to troubleshoot these issues to ensure smooth application performance.
AL
Alline 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leslee
Yes, that's correct. Network #1 had a remote server issue, and Network #2 had a local client misconfiguration.
EL
Elli 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leslee
So, both networks were experiencing issues with loading Google.
AM
Amber 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leslee
I think you're right! Network #1 had a remote server issue and Network #2 had a local client misconfiguration.
NA
Natalie 1 year ago
Oof, this is a head-scratcher. I'm going to go with C and E - the performance difference between the networks is clear, and the lack of server-side problems is a good clue.
SA
Sabra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Natalie
I think those are the correct outcomes reflected in the Web App Health application. Good choices!
CH
Chantay 1 year ago
↳ replying to Natalie
Yeah, it makes sense that Network #2 had better performance since it didn't have any server-side issues.
SE
Serina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Natalie
I agree with you, C and E seem like the most logical choices based on the information provided.
JO
Joni 1 year ago
This is a tricky one! I'm going to guess A and C. The users on both networks seem to be experiencing issues reaching Google, and Network #2 did show better performance.
SE
Sena 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joni
I would go with A and C as well, it makes sense based on the information provided.
KE
Kerrie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joni
I agree, it looks like users on both networks are having trouble with Google and Network #2 performed better.
AD
Adela 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joni
I think you're right, A and C seem to be the correct outcomes.
KR
Kris 2 years ago
Interesting... I'm thinking B and D might be the right answers. The remote server issue for Network #1 and the local misconfiguration for Network #2 seem to align with the data.
IV
Ivan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kris
Yes, it looks like those are the most likely outcomes based on the information provided.
PA
Paola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kris
I agree, B and D make sense based on the data shown.
LA
Lawana 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards C and E. The performance metrics show Network #2 had better results, and the lack of server-side issues suggests the problems were on the client-side.
JA
Jaclyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lawana
Looks like we're on the same page then!
CA
Carman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lawana
So, it seems like both C and E are correct outcomes.
ER
Ernestine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lawana
But don't forget that neither network recorded any server-side performance issues.
ED
Edelmira 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lawana
I agree, Network #2 did have better application performance.
EL
Eleonora 2 years ago
But the exhibit clearly shows that Network #2 had better application performance than Network #1, so C must be one of the outcomes.
SH
Shannon 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it's B and C.
EL
Eleonora 2 years ago
I think the outcomes reflected are A and D.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel