Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 500-220 Topic 2 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 2
[All 500-220 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Assuming this MX has established a full tunnel with its VPN peer, how will the MX route the WebEx traffic?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

By default, iOS apps provisioned through Systems Manager that are found in the App Store will self-update if automatic updates has been turned on in the Settings. For custom iOS apps, or to manually push down updates, check the following steps. https://documentation.meraki.com/SM/Apps_and_Software/Updating_Managed_iOS_Apps


by Ellsworth at Jun 01, 2024, 01:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-220 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Hoa
13 days ago
I bet the correct answer involves some kind of hidden camera or secret tunnel. This networking stuff is like a spy thriller!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
14 days ago
Wait, what if the WebEx traffic is sentient and decides to take a scenic route through both WANs? That would be a plot twist!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
17 days ago
Option A is interesting, but I'm not sure how the 'Conf' performance class thresholds would factor into the routing decision for WebEx traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
23 days ago
Hmm, Option B doesn't sound right to me. Just because WAN 1 is the primary uplink doesn't mean it should always be the preferred path for WebEx.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. As long as WAN 2 is up, it should be the preferred path for WebEx traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
2 months ago
Option D seems like the most logical choice here. Load-balancing WebEx traffic across both active WAN links ensures efficient use of network resources.
upvoted 0 times
Stephanie
Got it, so option B would be the failover solution for WebEx traffic if WAN 2 goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
2 days ago
In that case, the MX would route the WebEx traffic through WAN 1 as it is the primary uplink.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
13 days ago
But what if WAN 2 goes down? Wouldn't it be better to prioritize WAN 1 for WebEx traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
14 days ago
I agree, option D makes sense. Load-balancing will prevent congestion on a single link.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
27 days ago
But what if WAN 2 goes down, wouldn't it affect the WebEx traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
1 months ago
I agree, option D makes sense for load-balancing WebEx traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eden
2 months ago
But what if WAN 1 is congested? Wouldn't it make sense for the MX to route the traffic through WAN 2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) WebEx traffic will prefer WAN 1 as it is the primary uplink.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) WebEx traffic will prefer WAN 2 as long as it meets the thresholds in the ''Conf'' performance class.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel