MENU
There will be 100 concurrent users streaming video to their laptops. A 30/70 split between 2.4 Ghz and 5 Ghz will be used. Roughly how many APs (rounded to the nearest whole number) are needed based on client count?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 500-220 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
TE
Tenesha
11 months ago
Definitely need at least 4 for smooth streaming!
KA
Karima
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the split? Sounds off.
SA
Salome
11 months ago
3 seems too low for that many users.
TA
Tawna
11 months ago
Nah, I’d go with 5 just to be safe.
HE
Hershel
12 months ago
I think 4 APs should cover it.
MI
Michal
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the split and how that affects the total. I might be leaning towards option C, but I’m not entirely confident.
PA
Paris
1 year ago
I feel like the 2.4 GHz band has a lower capacity, so maybe we need more APs than I initially thought.
GE
German
1 year ago
I think we did a practice question similar to this one, and I want to say it was around 4 APs needed for a similar number of users.
LA
Lauran
1 year ago
I remember we discussed the capacity of APs in class, but I'm not sure how to calculate it for this specific split.
DE
Denise
1 year ago
This looks straightforward. I'll just need to do some quick math to determine the number of clients on each band and then choose the appropriate answer.
EL
Elenora
1 year ago
I think I've got this. The key is to consider the client distribution across the two frequency bands and then round up to the nearest whole number of APs needed.
GL
Glendora
1 year ago
Wait, how do I figure out the number of APs needed based on the client count? I'm a bit confused on the approach here.
AN
Anisha
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'll need to calculate the number of clients on each frequency band and then determine the appropriate number of APs.
EL
Elden
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. 30% of 100 clients on 2.4 GHz, and 70% on 5 GHz. That's a good starting point.
CA
Carolann
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. I know the valid device types are Pipe and Character, so I'll select those.
VI
Vincenza
1 year ago
I've got a strategy - I'll eliminate the options that don't seem to match the requirements, then evaluate the remaining ones more closely. Gotta be methodical on these exam questions.
VI
Victor
1 year ago
This question is a piece of cake! Just divide the number of clients by the maximum number of clients per AP and round up. Easy peasy!
SH
Sheron
1 year ago
Actually, it should be 100 divided by 30, which is about 3.33, so we round up to 4 APs
AS
Ashleigh
1 year ago
So 100 divided by 30 is roughly 3.33, which we round up to 4
RO
Ronna
1 year ago
I agree, we just need to divide 100 by the maximum number of clients per AP
FR
Frederica
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) 3
LO
Loren
1 year ago
I'm with Shawna on this one. The question is specifically asking about the number of APs needed based on the client count, so I think the answer has to be D) 5.
BR
Brittney
1 year ago
I'm with Shawna on this one, the answer has to be D) 5.
LY
Lyla
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) 4.
EV
Evangelina
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) 2.
NA
Nathan
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. Wouldn't it be more efficient to use fewer, more powerful APs to cover the area instead of having a ton of them? I'm going to go with C) 4 APs.
SH
Shawna
1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through. If we have 100 concurrent users, with a 30/70 split between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, that means we need at least 30 APs for the 2.4 GHz clients and 70 APs for the 5 GHz clients. That's a total of 100 APs, so the answer must be D) 5.
DO
Donette
1 year ago
Yes, having 5 APs would provide the necessary coverage for all the streaming users.
DE
Dell
1 year ago
That makes sense, we need to ensure there are enough APs to handle the split between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz clients.
HO
Honey
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) 5 because we need 100 APs in total for 100 concurrent users.
DE
Delila
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think we might need 5 APs to handle the load.
YA
Yan
2 years ago
I agree with Linn, 4 APs sounds about right for 100 users streaming video.
LI
Linn
2 years ago
I think we need at least 4 APs for that many users.
KR
Krissy
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think we might need 5 APs to handle the load.
GL
Glendora
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I think the number of APs needed would depend on the coverage area and signal strength, not just the client count.
AS
Asuncion
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, having 4 APs seems like a good balance for that many clients.
ET
Ethan
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is C) 4
KA
Katlyn
2 years ago
I agree with Timmy, 4 APs sound reasonable for that many users.
TI
Timmy
2 years ago
I think we need at least 4 APs for 100 users streaming video.