Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 500-220 Exam - Topic 1 Question 63 Discussion

There will be 100 concurrent users streaming video to their laptops. A 30/70 split between 2.4 Ghz and 5 Ghz will be used. Roughly how many APs (rounded to the nearest whole number) are needed based on client count?
A) 2
B) 3
C) 4
D) 5

Cisco 500-220 Exam - Topic 1 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 1
[All 500-220 Questions]

There will be 100 concurrent users streaming video to their laptops. A 30/70 split between 2.4 Ghz and 5 Ghz will be used. Roughly how many APs (rounded to the nearest whole number) are needed based on client count?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tenesha
9 months ago
Definitely need at least 4 for smooth streaming!
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the split? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
10 months ago
3 seems too low for that many users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
10 months ago
Nah, I’d go with 5 just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
10 months ago
I think 4 APs should cover it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the split and how that affects the total. I might be leaning towards option C, but I’m not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
11 months ago
I feel like the 2.4 GHz band has a lower capacity, so maybe we need more APs than I initially thought.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
11 months ago
I think we did a practice question similar to this one, and I want to say it was around 4 APs needed for a similar number of users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the capacity of APs in class, but I'm not sure how to calculate it for this specific split.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
11 months ago
This looks straightforward. I'll just need to do some quick math to determine the number of clients on each band and then choose the appropriate answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
11 months ago
I think I've got this. The key is to consider the client distribution across the two frequency bands and then round up to the nearest whole number of APs needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
11 months ago
Wait, how do I figure out the number of APs needed based on the client count? I'm a bit confused on the approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'll need to calculate the number of clients on each frequency band and then determine the appropriate number of APs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. 30% of 100 clients on 2.4 GHz, and 70% on 5 GHz. That's a good starting point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. I know the valid device types are Pipe and Character, so I'll select those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
11 months ago
I've got a strategy - I'll eliminate the options that don't seem to match the requirements, then evaluate the remaining ones more closely. Gotta be methodical on these exam questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
1 year ago
This question is a piece of cake! Just divide the number of clients by the maximum number of clients per AP and round up. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Sheron
1 year ago
Actually, it should be 100 divided by 30, which is about 3.33, so we round up to 4 APs
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
1 year ago
So 100 divided by 30 is roughly 3.33, which we round up to 4
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
1 year ago
I agree, we just need to divide 100 by the maximum number of clients per AP
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) 3
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loren
1 year ago
I'm with Shawna on this one. The question is specifically asking about the number of APs needed based on the client count, so I think the answer has to be D) 5.
upvoted 0 times
Brittney
1 year ago
I'm with Shawna on this one, the answer has to be D) 5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) 4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nathan
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. Wouldn't it be more efficient to use fewer, more powerful APs to cover the area instead of having a ton of them? I'm going to go with C) 4 APs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through. If we have 100 concurrent users, with a 30/70 split between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, that means we need at least 30 APs for the 2.4 GHz clients and 70 APs for the 5 GHz clients. That's a total of 100 APs, so the answer must be D) 5.
upvoted 0 times
Donette
1 year ago
Yes, having 5 APs would provide the necessary coverage for all the streaming users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
1 year ago
That makes sense, we need to ensure there are enough APs to handle the split between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) 5 because we need 100 APs in total for 100 concurrent users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delila
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think we might need 5 APs to handle the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
1 year ago
I agree with Linn, 4 APs sounds about right for 100 users streaming video.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
1 year ago
I think we need at least 4 APs for that many users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think we might need 5 APs to handle the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I think the number of APs needed would depend on the coverage area and signal strength, not just the client count.
upvoted 0 times
Asuncion
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, having 4 APs seems like a good balance for that many clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is C) 4
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katlyn
1 year ago
I agree with Timmy, 4 APs sound reasonable for that many users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
1 year ago
I think we need at least 4 APs for 100 users streaming video.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel