Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 500-220 Exam - Topic 1 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-220 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 1
[All 500-220 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Why does the end user complain of poor wireless performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Aron at Jul 02, 2024, 01:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-220 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dona
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure that's the real issue? Feels off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
5 months ago
20 MHz channel width? That could be limiting performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
5 months ago
I think the client should be on the primary radio, not the secondary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
6 months ago
Definitely a placement issue with that 18% non-802.11 traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
6 months ago
Channel 48 utilization is super high at 84%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
6 months ago
I vaguely recall that using a 20 MHz channel width can limit speed, but I’m not confident if that’s the main issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
6 months ago
I feel like the client connecting to the secondary radio could be a problem too. I think the primary radio usually has better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think non-802.11 traffic might suggest interference or bad placement of the AP. I saw a similar question in practice that mentioned that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
7 months ago
I remember studying about channel utilization, and 84 percent seems really high. That could definitely cause performance issues, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
7 months ago
The 20 MHz channel width is an interesting detail. That could be limiting the available bandwidth and contributing to the performance problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. The non-802.11 traffic of 18% also seems concerning. That could indicate an issue with AP placement or interference from other devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
7 months ago
The high channel utilization of 84% seems like a clear culprit to me. That's likely causing interference and poor performance for the end user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
7 months ago
This looks like a tricky wireless performance issue. I'll need to carefully analyze the information provided in the exhibit to determine the most likely cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
7 months ago
The client being connected to the secondary radio instead of the primary one could definitely be a factor. I'll need to think through the implications of that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
7 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the primary function of inventory. I'll need to carefully consider each option and think about which one best captures the key purpose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
7 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The ownership of these shared entities seems like it could be tricky to remember. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
2 years ago
I'm going with option C. The client is clearly trying to use the secondary radio instead of the primary one. Rookie mistake.
upvoted 0 times
Clement
2 years ago
I agree with User2, option C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
2 years ago
No way, it's definitely option C. The client should be connected to the primary radio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
2 years ago
I think option A is the reason for poor wireless performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nadine
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the user is just holding the device wrong. That's always a classic wireless troubleshooting technique!
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
2 years ago
The client using a 20 MHz channel width seems like the obvious answer to me. That's going to severely limit the available bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
Felton
2 years ago
Maybe the client being connected to the secondary radio instead of the primary radio is causing issues too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
2 years ago
Channel 48 utilization being at 84 percent is a red flag for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
2 years ago
I think the non-802.11 traffic of 18 percent could also be a contributing factor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelyn
2 years ago
The client using a 20 MHz channel width is definitely a problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marilynn
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. The non-802.11 traffic of 18% also sounds like a potential issue with AP placement. Maybe the AP is in a suboptimal location.
upvoted 0 times
Rima
2 years ago
I agree, but the non-802.11 traffic of 18% could also be a problem with AP placement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
2 years ago
I think the end user is using a 20 MHz channel width to connect.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusita
2 years ago
That's a good point, Irma. Using the secondary radio instead of the primary can impact performance. It's important to check that as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
2 years ago
I believe the end user might also be experiencing poor performance because they are connected to the secondary radio instead of the primary radio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
2 years ago
The high channel utilization on Channel 48 is definitely the culprit here. 84% is way too high for good wireless performance.
upvoted 0 times
Tricia
2 years ago
C) The client is connected to the secondary radio of the AP instead of the primary radio
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
2 years ago
A) Channel 48 utilization is at 84 percent.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kasandra
2 years ago
I agree with you, Vanna. High channel utilization can definitely lead to poor performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
2 years ago
I think the end user is complaining about poor wireless performance because of the high channel utilization on Channel 48.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel