MENU
Refer to the exhibit.
Why does the end user complain of poor wireless performance?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 500-220 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
DO
Dona
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure that's the real issue? Feels off.
MA
Marjory
11 months ago
20 MHz channel width? That could be limiting performance.
PI
Pilar
11 months ago
I think the client should be on the primary radio, not the secondary.
VE
Veda
11 months ago
Definitely a placement issue with that 18% non-802.11 traffic.
KI
Kizzy
12 months ago
Channel 48 utilization is super high at 84%.
WH
Whitney
12 months ago
I vaguely recall that using a 20 MHz channel width can limit speed, but I’m not confident if that’s the main issue here.
CA
Cammy
1 year ago
I feel like the client connecting to the secondary radio could be a problem too. I think the primary radio usually has better performance.
LA
Layla
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think non-802.11 traffic might suggest interference or bad placement of the AP. I saw a similar question in practice that mentioned that.
CA
Carmen
1 year ago
I remember studying about channel utilization, and 84 percent seems really high. That could definitely cause performance issues, right?
FA
Fabiola
1 year ago
The 20 MHz channel width is an interesting detail. That could be limiting the available bandwidth and contributing to the performance problems.
TH
Thaddeus
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. The non-802.11 traffic of 18% also seems concerning. That could indicate an issue with AP placement or interference from other devices.
DE
Dell
1 year ago
The high channel utilization of 84% seems like a clear culprit to me. That's likely causing interference and poor performance for the end user.
IS
Isreal
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky wireless performance issue. I'll need to carefully analyze the information provided in the exhibit to determine the most likely cause.
IV
Ivette
1 year ago
The client being connected to the secondary radio instead of the primary one could definitely be a factor. I'll need to think through the implications of that.
BA
Barb
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the primary function of inventory. I'll need to carefully consider each option and think about which one best captures the key purpose.
LE
Leanna
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The ownership of these shared entities seems like it could be tricky to remember. I'll need to think it through carefully.
AL
Alona
2 years ago
I'm going with option C. The client is clearly trying to use the secondary radio instead of the primary one. Rookie mistake.
CL
Clement
2 years ago
I agree with User2, option C makes the most sense here.
CA
Carole
2 years ago
No way, it's definitely option C. The client should be connected to the primary radio.
TA
Tasia
2 years ago
I think option A is the reason for poor wireless performance.
NA
Nadine
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the user is just holding the device wrong. That's always a classic wireless troubleshooting technique!
YO
Youlanda
2 years ago
The client using a 20 MHz channel width seems like the obvious answer to me. That's going to severely limit the available bandwidth.
FE
Felton
2 years ago
Maybe the client being connected to the secondary radio instead of the primary radio is causing issues too.
RO
Rodolfo
2 years ago
Channel 48 utilization being at 84 percent is a red flag for sure.
AN
Antonette
2 years ago
I think the non-802.11 traffic of 18 percent could also be a contributing factor.
AN
Angelyn
2 years ago
The client using a 20 MHz channel width is definitely a problem.
MA
Marilynn
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. The non-802.11 traffic of 18% also sounds like a potential issue with AP placement. Maybe the AP is in a suboptimal location.
RI
Rima
2 years ago
I agree, but the non-802.11 traffic of 18% could also be a problem with AP placement.
DE
Deangelo
2 years ago
I think the end user is using a 20 MHz channel width to connect.
JE
Jesusita
2 years ago
That's a good point, Irma. Using the secondary radio instead of the primary can impact performance. It's important to check that as well.
IR
Irma
2 years ago
I believe the end user might also be experiencing poor performance because they are connected to the secondary radio instead of the primary radio.
JA
Janessa
2 years ago
The high channel utilization on Channel 48 is definitely the culprit here. 84% is way too high for good wireless performance.
TR
Tricia
2 years ago
C) The client is connected to the secondary radio of the AP instead of the primary radio
DA
Dahlia
2 years ago
A) Channel 48 utilization is at 84 percent.
KA
Kasandra
2 years ago
I agree with you, Vanna. High channel utilization can definitely lead to poor performance.
VA
Vanna
2 years ago
I think the end user is complaining about poor wireless performance because of the high channel utilization on Channel 48.