MENU
A service provider recently migrated to an SD-WAN solution for delivering WAN connections to its customers. One of the main challenges with the SD-WAN deployment is that branch site volume increases every year, which causes management complexity. Which action resolves the issue?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 400-007 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
HA
Han
11 months ago
Management complexity is definitely a challenge with growing branches!
MI
Michell
11 months ago
Wait, is a dedicated team really the best solution? Seems like a lot of overhead.
LA
Lajuana
11 months ago
Building a service orchestration platform could complicate things more.
SU
Susy
11 months ago
I think adopting a service management lifecycle model is the way to go!
DY
Dylan
12 months ago
A scalable network management system sounds like a solid plan.
TE
Tequila
12 months ago
Setting up a dedicated team, like in option D, could help with monitoring, but I wonder if that’s really a long-term solution for management complexity.
CA
Carissa
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards option C because building a service orchestration platform seems like it could streamline management. But I’m not completely confident about it.
BR
Brittney
1 year ago
I feel like option B makes sense too, especially since we practiced a question about lifecycle models in our last session. It might help with the complexity.
GR
Gregg
1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of scalability in SD-WAN management. I think option A could be the right choice, but I'm not entirely sure.
VA
Vanda
1 year ago
Setting up a dedicated team to monitor and provision new customers seems like it could work, but I'm not sure if that's the most efficient or scalable solution. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons of each option.
KI
Kimberlie
1 year ago
Adopting a well-structured SD-WAN service management lifecycle model could be a smart approach. That would ensure the service is properly managed throughout its entire lifecycle.
DA
Dallas
1 year ago
Building a service orchestration platform on top of the network controller sounds like a good strategy to me. That would help automate and streamline the management of all the branch sites.
SH
Sherita
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The options all seem like they could potentially address the issue. I'll need to think it through carefully before selecting an answer.
DA
Darnell
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I think implementing a scalable network management system would be the best way to handle the increasing branch site volume and management complexity.
SA
Sarah
1 year ago
I'm picturing the network admin trying to manage all those branch sites with a spreadsheet and a prayer. Time to upgrade to some real network management software!
KY
Kyoko
1 year ago
C) Build a service orchestration platform on top of the network controller
JU
Judy
1 year ago
B) Adopt a well-structured SD-WAN service management lifecycle model
TY
Ty
1 year ago
A) Implement a scalable network management system to manage all sites.
AV
Avery
1 year ago
Setting up a dedicated team to monitor and provision new customers? That's like trying to put out a forest fire with a garden hose. We need a solution that can handle the scale, not just more people.
BE
Ben
1 year ago
C) Build a service orchestration platform on top of the network controller
AD
Adelina
1 year ago
B) Adopt a well-structured SD-WAN service management lifecycle model
JU
Juan
1 year ago
A) Implement a scalable network management system to manage all sites.
CA
Casie
1 year ago
Building a service orchestration platform on top of the network controller could be a good option, but it might be overkill for this specific challenge. A simpler network management system might be more appropriate.
LO
Lottie
1 year ago
C) Build a service orchestration platform on top of the network controller
MA
Marva
1 year ago
Building a service orchestration platform on top of the network controller could be a good option, but it might be overkill for this specific challenge. A simpler network management system might be more appropriate.
EV
Evangelina
1 year ago
B) Adopt a well-structured SD-WAN service management lifecycle model
PE
Percy
1 year ago
A) Implement a scalable network management system to manage all sites.
AL
Alva
2 years ago
Adopting an SD-WAN service management lifecycle model could also help, but I'm not sure if that alone would be enough to solve the problem. A more comprehensive solution like a network management system might be necessary.
IN
Ines
2 years ago
Implementing a scalable network management system seems like the logical choice here. It's the only option that directly addresses the issue of increasing branch site volume and management complexity.
MA
Mauricio
1 year ago
B) Adopt a well-structured SD-WAN service management lifecycle model
LA
Latanya
1 year ago
A) Implement a scalable network management system to manage all sites.
RO
Roselle
2 years ago
I believe option C could also be a good choice, as a service orchestration platform can streamline operations.
PH
Phung
2 years ago
I agree with Flo, a scalable network management system would help with the increasing volume.
FL
Flo
2 years ago
I think option A is the best solution.