Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 400-007 Exam - Topic 5 Question 80 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.An engineer has been asked to redesign the traffic flow toward AS 111 coming from AS 500. Traffic destined to AS 111 network 91.7.0.0/16 should come in via AS 100, while traffic destined to all other networks in AS 111 should continue to use the existing path. Which BGP attributes are best suited to control this inbound traffic coming from BGP AS 500 into the 91.7.0.0/16 network?
A) Prepend AS path for the 91.7.0.0/16 network and set it for neighbor in AS 200.
B) Use extended community for the 91.7.0.0/16 network, not advertising it to the bi-lateral peer.
C) Use local preference on R1 for the networks that AS 500 advertises to AS 111.
D) Set higher MED for neighbor in AS 100 to influence incoming traffic for the 91.7.0.0/16 network.

Cisco 400-007 Exam - Topic 5 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 5
[All 400-007 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer has been asked to redesign the traffic flow toward AS 111 coming from AS 500. Traffic destined to AS 111 network 91.7.0.0/16 should come in via AS 100, while traffic destined to all other networks in AS 111 should continue to use the existing path. Which BGP attributes are best suited to control this inbound traffic coming from BGP AS 500 into the 91.7.0.0/16 network?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Inbound traffic engineering is best controlled by manipulating how external ASes view your routes.

AS path prepending on the 91.7.0.0/16 prefix towards AS 200 makes AS 500 prefer the less-prepended path through AS 100.

This allows granular inbound control for that specific prefix while leaving the rest of the traffic unchanged.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: Extended community is not used for direct inbound path manipulation.

C: Local preference affects outbound traffic, not inbound path selection by remote ASes.

D: MED is only compared between the same AS; it won't affect AS 500's choice.

---


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Harrison
3 days ago
True, but it might complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
8 days ago
But what about A? Prepending AS path could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
13 days ago
I agree with Junita. It makes sense for AS 100.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
18 days ago
I think D is the way to go. Higher MED can really influence traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
24 days ago
This question is tricky! I feel unsure about the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
29 days ago
Wait, I didn't know MED could influence incoming traffic like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
1 month ago
Prepending AS path might complicate things unnecessarily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
1 month ago
Isn't using extended community in option B a bit risky?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
1 month ago
I disagree, I think option C is more effective for local routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
2 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice for controlling inbound traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
2 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the extended community option; I don’t recall how it affects advertising to peers. Is it really the right choice for this case?
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manipulate MED values, so I feel like setting a higher MED for AS 100 might be a good strategy for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
2 months ago
I think using local preference could help prioritize the traffic for 91.7.0.0/16, but I need to double-check how it interacts with other attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
2 months ago
I remember something about using AS path prepending to influence traffic, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel