MENU
Company XYZ has two routing domains in their network, EIGRP and OSPF. The company wants to provide full reachability between the two domains by implementing redistribution on a router running both protocols. They need to design the redistribution in a way that the OSPF routers will see link costs added to external routes. How must the redistribution strategy be designed for this network?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 400-007 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
SE
Sena
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A too. It simplifies the routing decisions for OSPF.
CA
Caitlin
3 months ago
I prefer option B. Metric type 1 allows OSPF to consider both internal and external costs.
SH
Shala
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Metric type 2 keeps OSPF costs intact.
MI
Millie
3 months ago
I thought EIGRP was better for this, not sure about OSPF.
HE
Helga
4 months ago
Definitely B, OSPF needs to see those costs right!
TR
Trevor
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Type 1 seems risky.
EF
Effie
5 months ago
I think A is better, type 2 just adds confusion.
JA
Janessa
6 months ago
Gotta go with B, metric type 1 is the way to go!
RO
Rolland
6 months ago
I vaguely remember that type 2 metrics don’t add the internal cost to the external routes, so maybe that means we should go with type 1 for OSPF?
AR
Arlen
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between metric types in EIGRP and OSPF. I hope I can recall the specifics during the exam.
GA
Gail
7 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to decide between metric type 1 and type 2 for OSPF redistribution. I feel like type 1 is the right choice for this scenario.
PE
Pedro
7 months ago
I remember studying that OSPF uses different metric types for external routes, but I'm not sure which one to choose here.