MENU
You are designing a large-scale DMVPN network with more than 500 spokes using EIGRP as the IGP protocol Which design option eliminates potential tunnel down events on the spoke routers due to the holding time expiration?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 400-007 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
LE
Leoma
10 months ago
I heard increasing the hold queue on the hub router helps too.
AH
Ahmed
10 months ago
Wait, isn't QoS more about prioritizing traffic than preventing tunnel downs?
BO
Bo
10 months ago
Totally agree, that makes sense for stability!
SA
Salena
10 months ago
I think increasing the hold queue on the tunnel interface of the spoke routers is key.
RO
Royce
11 months ago
Surprised this isn't more common knowledge in large DMVPN setups!
BI
Billy
11 months ago
I vaguely recall that increasing the hold queue on the spoke routers could be a solution, but I’m not entirely confident.
JA
Janine
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about QoS options here. Would applying QoS really prevent tunnel down events?
RE
Rebeca
11 months ago
I think we discussed similar questions in class, and I feel like increasing the hold queue on the tunnel interface might help with stability.
JE
Jestine
12 months ago
I remember something about hold queues, but I'm not sure if it's better to adjust the hub or spoke interfaces.
ST
Stevie
12 months ago
Increasing the hold queue on the hub router's tunnel interface seems like it might work, but I'm not 100% confident that's the right answer.
FE
Fernanda
1 year ago
Applying QoS for the pak_priority class could be an interesting approach, but I'm not sure if that's the best solution for this specific issue.
JA
Jamal
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Let me re-read it a few times to make sure I understand the problem.
FR
Frank
1 year ago
Hmm, increasing the hold queue on the spoke routers' tunnel interfaces seems like the most logical choice here.
BR
Brianne
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky DMVPN question. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
LO
Lorenza
1 year ago
I agree with Lashaunda, but I also think applying QoS for pak_priority class could be a good option to consider.
PA
Patrick
1 year ago
Increasing the hold queue on the tunnel interface of the spoke routers seems like the way to go. That should help prevent those pesky tunnel down events.
LE
Lenora
9 months ago
Let’s hope it reduces those tunnel issues!
LA
Latonia
9 months ago
I’ve seen that approach work well in similar setups.
KA
Kassandra
10 months ago
Definitely! It should stabilize the connections.
DE
Deeanna
11 months ago
I agree, increasing the hold queue on the spoke routers makes sense.
LA
Lashaunda
1 year ago
I think increasing the hold queue on the tunnel interface of the spoke routers could help prevent tunnel down events.