Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 400-007 Exam - Topic 4 Question 67 Discussion

You are designing a large-scale DMVPN network with more than 500 spokes using EIGRP as the IGP protocol Which design option eliminates potential tunnel down events on the spoke routers due to the holding time expiration?
C) Increase the hold queue on the tunnel interface of the hub router
A) Increase the hold queue on the physical interface of the hub router.
B) Increase the hold queue on the tunnel interface of the spoke routers
D) Apply QoS for pak_priority class
E) Increase the hold queue on the physical interface of the spoke routers.

Cisco 400-007 Exam - Topic 4 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 4
[All 400-007 Questions]

You are designing a large-scale DMVPN network with more than 500 spokes using EIGRP as the IGP protocol Which design option eliminates potential tunnel down events on the spoke routers due to the holding time expiration?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Raylene at Aug 13, 2025, 06:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 400-007 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leoma
8 months ago
I heard increasing the hold queue on the hub router helps too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
8 months ago
Wait, isn't QoS more about prioritizing traffic than preventing tunnel downs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
9 months ago
Totally agree, that makes sense for stability!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
9 months ago
I think increasing the hold queue on the tunnel interface of the spoke routers is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
9 months ago
Surprised this isn't more common knowledge in large DMVPN setups!
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
9 months ago
I vaguely recall that increasing the hold queue on the spoke routers could be a solution, but I’m not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused about QoS options here. Would applying QoS really prevent tunnel down events?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
10 months ago
I think we discussed similar questions in class, and I feel like increasing the hold queue on the tunnel interface might help with stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
10 months ago
I remember something about hold queues, but I'm not sure if it's better to adjust the hub or spoke interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
10 months ago
Increasing the hold queue on the hub router's tunnel interface seems like it might work, but I'm not 100% confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
11 months ago
Applying QoS for the pak_priority class could be an interesting approach, but I'm not sure if that's the best solution for this specific issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Let me re-read it a few times to make sure I understand the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
11 months ago
Hmm, increasing the hold queue on the spoke routers' tunnel interfaces seems like the most logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky DMVPN question. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
11 months ago
I agree with Lashaunda, but I also think applying QoS for pak_priority class could be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
12 months ago
Increasing the hold queue on the tunnel interface of the spoke routers seems like the way to go. That should help prevent those pesky tunnel down events.
upvoted 0 times
Lenora
8 months ago
Let’s hope it reduces those tunnel issues!
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
8 months ago
I’ve seen that approach work well in similar setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
8 months ago
Definitely! It should stabilize the connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
9 months ago
I agree, increasing the hold queue on the spoke routers makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashaunda
12 months ago
I think increasing the hold queue on the tunnel interface of the spoke routers could help prevent tunnel down events.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel