Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 400-007 Exam - Topic 4 Question 46 Discussion

Posted by Holley on Aug 07, 2024 at 01:33 PM

Refer to the exhibit.

As part of a redesign project, you must predict multicast behavior What happens to the multicast traffic received on the shared tree (*,G), if it is received on the LHR interface indicated*?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium 400-007 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
TI
Tiera 11 months ago
Wait, it can just be dropped? That’s wild!
WI
Willard 11 months ago
No RPF check means it gets switched, right?
LE
Lelia 11 months ago
I thought RPF checks were always mandatory?
RI
Rikki 11 months ago
Definitely goes through if RPF check is good!
VI
Viola 12 months ago
Multicast traffic on shared trees can be tricky.
NA
Natalie 12 months ago
D sounds familiar too, but I can't remember if it specifically relates to the multicast receiver or not.
BE
Beckie 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards C because I recall that a successful RPF check means the traffic is allowed through, but I could be mixing it up.
CY
Cyril 1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question where multicast traffic was switched if no RPF check was performed, so maybe B is correct?
CH
Christiane 1 year ago
I think the answer might be A, but I'm not completely sure about the RPF check details.
FR
Francine 1 year ago
This looks like a classic multicast routing question. I'll apply my knowledge of RPF checks and shared trees to eliminate the incorrect options and select the right answer.
CA
Carman 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to focus on the RPF (Reverse Path Forwarding) check and how that affects the multicast traffic on the shared tree.
FL
Floyd 1 year ago
Hmm, the exhibit shows a network diagram, so I'll need to carefully analyze the information provided to determine the multicast behavior.
AL
Alaine 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the details correctly before answering.
RU
Ruby 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the shared tree (*,G) concept. I'll need to review my notes on multicast routing to make sure I'm applying the right principles here.
MA
Marlon 1 year ago
I think the answer is C - only authorized users. That seems to be the most straightforward interpretation of the question.
TO
Tom 1 year ago
Scalability sounds important, but I'm not sure how it directly relates to threat reduction on surface areas.
LA
Laurena 1 year ago
Option F: The multicast traffic is transformed into glitter and confetti, raining down on the unsuspecting network engineers. It's a multicast party!
DI
Diego 1 year ago
Option B is tempting, but I think the question is looking for a more specific answer. No RPF check doesn't sound quite right.
ME
Merilyn 1 year ago
Option D is just weird. Why would it be dropped due to an RPF check against the multicast receiver? That doesn't seem right.
GE
Geoffrey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merilyn
User 3: Yeah, it seems like option D is not the correct answer. We should probably go with another option.
TR
Tresa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merilyn
User 2: I agree, that does seem strange. Maybe it's a mistake in the options.
FR
Fredric 1 year ago
↳ replying to Merilyn
User 1: I think option D is incorrect. It doesn't make sense to drop multicast traffic based on an RPF check against the receiver.
CH
Cherry 1 year ago
Option A seems incorrect. The question states it's received on the LHR interface, so there shouldn't be an unsuccessful RPF check against the source.
PA
Paris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cherry
D) It is dropped due to an unsuccessful RPF check against the multicast receiver.
CA
Carisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cherry
C) It is switched due to a successful RPF check against the routing table
EL
Elvera 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cherry
B) It is switched give that no RPF check is performed
DY
Dyan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cherry
A) It is dropped due to an unsuccessful RPF check against the multicast source
JO
Joseph 2 years ago
Option C makes the most sense. If the RPF check against the routing table is successful, the multicast traffic should be switched.
BR
Brice 2 years ago
I agree with Devon, the multicast traffic will be dropped if the RPF check against the multicast source fails.
HU
Hubert 2 years ago
I believe the multicast traffic will be switched since no RPF check is performed.
DE
Devon 2 years ago
I think the multicast traffic will be dropped due to an unsuccessful RPF check against the multicast source.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel