Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 400-007 Exam - Topic 3 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 400-007 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 3
[All 400-007 Questions]

You are designing the QoS policy for a company that is running many TCP-based applications. The company is experiencing tail drops for these applications. The company wants to use a congestion avoidance technique for these applications. Which QoS strategy can be used to fulfill the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Sarah at Sep 01, 2023, 12:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 400-007 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Clemencia
4 months ago
Low-latency queuing could work too, but WRED seems better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
4 months ago
Surprised WRED is the answer, thought it would be something else!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
5 months ago
Isn't FIFO just too basic for this situation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
5 months ago
I agree, WRED helps manage tail drops effectively!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
5 months ago
Weighted random early detection is a solid choice for congestion avoidance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think weighted random early detection was highlighted as a good option for congestion management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
6 months ago
Weighted fair queuing sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it specifically addresses tail drops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like low-latency queuing could help with TCP applications too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
6 months ago
I remember studying about congestion avoidance techniques, and I think weighted random early detection might be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
6 months ago
I'm confident that weighted random early detection (WRED) is the best answer here. It's a well-known congestion avoidance technique that can help prevent tail drops by selectively dropping packets before the queue fills up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
6 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. Tail drops suggest we need a congestion avoidance technique, and the options given include some common QoS strategies. I'm leaning towards weighted random early detection, as that's designed to proactively manage congestion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know QoS policies can get pretty complex, and I want to make sure I understand the requirements fully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward QoS question. I think the key is to identify the congestion avoidance technique that can help with the tail drops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards weighted fair queuing. It seems like it would help ensure fair allocation of bandwidth and prevent any single application from dominating the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
6 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. Weighted random early detection seems like it could be a good option to avoid the tail drops, since it proactively drops packets before the queue gets full.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know QoS is all about managing network traffic, but I'm not sure which specific strategy would be best for addressing tail drops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
6 months ago
This looks like a classic QoS question. I think the key is to identify the congestion avoidance technique that can help with the tail drops for the TCP-based applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
6 months ago
Hmm, not sure about this. I'll have to review my notes on different encoding techniques.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with XPath, so I'll need to review that concept before I can confidently answer this. Maybe I can find some examples of XPath injection attacks to get a better understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
6 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this question. The company needs to proactively manage their accounts receivable, so the Customer statements and Collection letter options seem like essential recommendations. I'll also suggest the Stop customer option to prevent new sales until past due invoices are paid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
6 months ago
I think you run it through the Control Room, but I'm not entirely sure if that's right.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel