Refer to the exhibit.

An application uses an API to periodically sync a large data set. Based on the HTTP message sequence provided, which statements are true about the caching behavior seen in the scenario? (Choose two.)
Suggested Answer: A, D
Get Premium 350-901 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
AL
Alexis
1 month ago
So, B and C seem like the best picks.
YO
Yolando
2 months ago
Yeah, #3 and #5 can't be the same.
VA
Val
2 months ago
Good point! E is also questionable.
AL
Alexis
2 months ago
D is definitely false. Changes happened.
YO
Yolando
2 months ago
C makes sense. Partial data in #4.
VA
Val
2 months ago
Right! I feel C could be true too.
AL
Alexis
2 months ago
A seems wrong. Full dataset twice? No way.
VA
Val
3 months ago
I agree. But what about A?
YO
Yolando
3 months ago
The dataset must have changed between #4 and #5.
AL
Alexis
3 months ago
Why B?
YO
Yolando
3 months ago
I think B is correct.
VA
Val
3 months ago
This question is tricky.
RO
Robt
3 months ago
Not convinced that messages #3 and #5 are equivalent.
PE
Peggie
4 months ago
C) A partial dataset was transmitted in message #4, for sure!
OD
Odelia
4 months ago
Wait, did the dataset really change between #4 and #5?
ME
Merrilee
5 months ago
Totally agree, looks like a full sync happened.
MI
Miles
6 months ago
A) The full dataset was transmitted to the client twice.
ON
Oneida
6 months ago
I thought we discussed that if the dataset didn't change, it would affect the caching behavior, but I’m not completely confident about that here.
DA
Darell
6 months ago
I feel like message #3 and #5 could be equivalent, but I can't recall the specifics of how to determine that.
AM
Amber
7 months ago
I think I practiced a question like this where we had to identify changes in the dataset. Maybe the dataset did change between messages #4 and #5?
GI
Gilma
7 months ago
I remember something about caching, but I'm not sure if the full dataset was sent twice. That seems a bit off.