Which method must be used to connect Cisco Secure Workload to external orchestrators at a client site when the client does not allow incoming connections?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 350-701 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
To connect Cisco Secure Workload to external orchestrators at a client site where incoming connections are not allowed, a reverse tunnel must be used. A reverse tunnel initiates the connection from the inside of the client's network out to the external orchestrator, thereby bypassing restrictions on incoming connections and enabling secure communication.
32 comments · newest first
LU
Lucina
11 months ago
I agree, reverse tunnel seems to fit the bill perfectly!
AN
Annamaria
11 months ago
Wait, are you sure reverse tunnel is the only way?
MA
Marylyn
11 months ago
Source NAT is a common method too, but not the best here.
GI
Gilma
11 months ago
I thought GRE tunnels were also an option?
AL
Albina
12 months ago
Definitely reverse tunnel for this scenario.
MI
Ming
12 months ago
Destination NAT sounds familiar, but I don't recall it being specifically for this type of connection issue.
ME
Melodie
1 year ago
I could be wrong, but I think source NAT might be more about translating outgoing connections rather than connecting to orchestrators.
KA
Karima
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like GRE tunnels were mentioned in a similar context during our practice sessions.
CA
Carmen
1 year ago
I think I remember something about reverse tunnels being used for situations where incoming connections are blocked.
SH
Shaquana
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to be focused on different networking techniques, but I'll need to make sure I understand how each one would work in this specific scenario with the client's constraints. I'll review my networking concepts before answering.
MO
Mozell
1 year ago
Hmm, the key here seems to be the client not allowing incoming connections. I'm thinking reverse tunnel might be the way to go, since that would initiate the connection from the Cisco Secure Workload side.
HA
Harrison
1 year ago
This looks like a networking question related to connecting Cisco Secure Workload to external orchestrators. I'll need to think through the different options and consider the client's requirement of not allowing incoming connections.
AL
Alita
1 year ago
Okay, let me walk through this step-by-step. If the client doesn't allow incoming connections, then source NAT and destination NAT are probably not the right answers. GRE tunnel could work, but a reverse tunnel seems like the most direct solution to meet the client's requirement.
AL
Alishia
1 year ago
This seems straightforward. I'll carefully read through the options and eliminate the ones that are clearly part of test implementation and execution.
OR
Oren
2 years ago
Wow, this question really gets the brain juices flowing! Reverse tunnel all the way, baby!
OW
Owen
2 years ago
Definitely a solid choice for connecting Cisco Secure Workload to external orchestrators.
LE
Lenora
2 years ago
I've used reverse tunnel before and it worked like a charm.
AM
Amber
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. It's the best option when the client doesn't allow incoming connections.
LE
Leota
2 years ago
I think reverse tunnel is the way to go.
FR
Franchesca
2 years ago
I'm going to have to go with B as well. Reverse tunnel is the way to connect when the client blocks incoming connections.
YO
Yoko
2 years ago
I agree, B) reverse tunnel is the correct method in this case.
SU
Sunshine
2 years ago
Yes, reverse tunnel is the way to go when incoming connections are blocked.
SH
Shawna
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) reverse tunnel.
LA
Lavonda
2 years ago
Definitely B. Reverse tunnel, that's the only option that makes sense in this scenario.
MI
Mica
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) GRE tunnel could also be a valid option for connecting Cisco Secure Workload to external orchestrators.
GR
Gregoria
2 years ago
I agree with Robt, because reverse tunnel allows for outgoing connections without needing incoming connections.
RO
Robt
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) reverse tunnel.
JO
Johanna
2 years ago
Hmm, I think the answer is B. Reverse tunnel seems like the way to go when you can't have incoming connections.
TA
Tawny
2 years ago
I've heard that GRE tunnel might be another option to consider.
CL
Clement
2 years ago
I'm not sure about source NAT, but I believe reverse tunnel is the correct choice.
VE
Vernell
2 years ago
I think source NAT could also work in this situation.
LY
Lynette
2 years ago
I agree, reverse tunnel is the best option in that scenario.