MENU
[Network Security]
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is implementing a certificate-based VPN. What is the result of the existing configuration?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 350-701 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
TH
Theola
6 months ago
C is my pick. It ensures only specific peers can establish a connection.
MI
Mi
6 months ago
I agree with B. The identity matching is key for authorization.
JA
Jamal
6 months ago
Option A seems misleading. Encryption doesn't apply here.
RE
Reita
7 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D. It clearly states the OU is set to MANGLER.
TO
Tora
7 months ago
I feel like option C makes sense too. Only peers with the right OU should connect.
LI
Lizette
7 months ago
I think option B is correct. The OU is crucial for identity matching.
AM
Amie
7 months ago
Definitely D, that's what the config shows.
SH
Shawnna
7 months ago
Wait, is MANGLER even a real OU? Sounds weird.
SA
Salena
8 months ago
C seems off, not all peers need that attribute.
IV
Ivan
8 months ago
I think B is correct, it matches the policy.
RY
Ryann
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the implications of the OU being set to MANGLER. Is it just a label, or does it actually impact the connection process?
HE
Herminia
8 months ago
I feel like I read that if the OU is set to a specific value, it could restrict which peers can establish a connection. Maybe option C is correct?
MA
Marylyn
9 months ago
I think I came across a similar question where the OU was mentioned as part of the identity in IKEv2. Could it be option B?
FL
Flo
9 months ago
Hmm, I wonder if the MANGLER has a secret handshake too.
FR
Franklyn
9 months ago
D) The OU of the IKEv2 peer certificate is set to MANGLER.
CA
Cary
9 months ago
C) Only an IKEv2 peer that has an OU certificate attribute set to MANGLER establishes an IKEv2 SA successfully.
RA
Raina
9 months ago
B) The OU of the IKEv2 peer certificate is used as the identity when matching an IKEv2 authorization policy.
BE
Bernadine
9 months ago
I think I've got a handle on this. I'll start by analyzing the exhibit, then carefully consider each answer choice to determine the most likely outcome of the existing configuration.
CA
Carey
10 months ago
Based on the options, it seems like the OU attribute is being used for authorization. I'll focus on how that might affect the VPN connection and which option best describes the result.
RE
Rebbecca
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to read through it a few times to make sure I fully understand what's being asked.
RI
Rikki
10 months ago
I remember something about how the OU can affect the authorization policy, but I'm not sure if it's specifically about matching it.
JO
Joaquin
10 months ago
The OU is set to MANGLER, that's a fact.
AL
Alline
11 months ago
Wait, is MANGLER a new cybersecurity certification? I'm in!
OL
Olga
11 months ago
Okay, the key here seems to be understanding how the OU attribute in the IKEv2 peer certificate is being used. I'll need to consider the different options and how they might impact the VPN connection.
GR
Gracia
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the exhibit and think through the implications of the certificate configuration.
JU
Justa
6 months ago
I need to analyze the implications more before deciding.
RO
Rodrigo
6 months ago
But what about option C? It seems specific.
MI
Miss
6 months ago
I think option B makes sense for identity matching.
LE
Leonor
10 months ago
This is definitely a complex setup.
MI
Minna
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards D. It’s straightforward.