Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 350-701 Exam - Topic 1 Question 101 Discussion

Posted by Darrin on Oct 24, 2024 at 04:05 AM

What must be configured on Cisco Secure Endpoint to create a custom detection tile list to detect and quarantine future files?

Suggested Answer: C

In Cisco Secure Endpoint, to create a custom detection file list for detecting and quarantining future files, an advanced custom detection should be created, and the hash of each file to be detected and quarantined should be uploaded. This allows the system to uniquely identify and take action on files based on their hash values, providing a precise method for targeting specific malicious or unwanted files.


Get Premium 350-701 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
FR
Franchesca 11 months ago
Nah, blocking files with IP lists won't work here.
LA
Lachelle 11 months ago
Simple custom detection is also an option, but not as effective.
SK
Skye 11 months ago
Wait, can you really just upload hashes? Sounds too easy.
FR
Franchesca 11 months ago
Totally agree, option C is the way to go.
JA
Jacquelyne 12 months ago
Gotta use advanced custom detection for file hashes!
CA
Catarina 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m a bit confused about the difference between advanced and simple custom detections.
PA
Paola 1 year ago
I recall a question similar to this where we had to configure allowed applications. But that seems more about blocking than detecting.
MI
Micheline 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the simple custom detection feature could also work. Did we practice that in class?
GA
Gabriele 1 year ago
I think we might need to create an advanced custom detection for this. I remember something about uploading file hashes.
TI
Tiera 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Is the application control allowed list really an option here? That doesn't seem like it would create a custom detection list. I'm leaning towards either A or C.
ME
Merrilee 1 year ago
The key here is to create a custom detection tile list to detect and quarantine the files. I'm pretty confident that option C, creating an advanced custom detection and uploading the hashes, is the way to go.
AN
Angelo 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'm trying to decide between the custom detection and the advanced custom detection options. I'll need to think it through a bit more.
LO
Louisa 1 year ago
This seems straightforward - I think the answer is to use the simple custom detection feature and add each file to the list.
VA
Valentin 2 years ago
Option A might work, but it sounds like a lot of manual work. I'd prefer a more automated solution like Option C.
SH
Shawna 2 years ago
Haha, Option D is like trying to catch a fish with a net full of holes! Application control won't do much to stop those pesky files.
LA
Latonia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shawna
User 3: Yeah, Option D does seem like it wouldn't be very effective in this situation. Option C is definitely the way to go.
LI
Linn 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shawna
User 2: I agree, Option C seems like the most thorough method to detect and quarantine future files.
AD
Adrianna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Shawna
User 1: Option C sounds like the best way to go. Uploading the hash of each file for detection seems pretty effective.
LI
Ligia 2 years ago
I agree with Sylvie, option C makes the most sense for creating a custom detection tile list.
CA
Callie 2 years ago
I'm not sure about Option B. Blocking network IPs doesn't seem like the right way to handle this type of security issue.
EL
Eliseo 2 years ago
↳ replying to Callie
User 4: I think Option A could work too. Adding each detection to the list using the simple custom detection feature.
LA
Larae 2 years ago
↳ replying to Callie
User 3: I'm not sure about Option B either. Blocking network IPs doesn't seem like the right approach for this.
CO
Corrina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Callie
User 2: I agree with you, Corrina. Option C seems like the most secure way to handle this.
DE
Devora 2 years ago
↳ replying to Callie
User 1: I think Option C is the best choice. Uploading the hash of each file for detection sounds effective.
SY
Sylvie 2 years ago
I think the answer is C) Create an advanced custom detection and upload the hash of each file.
GA
Gabriele 2 years ago
Option C seems the most comprehensive approach to detecting and quarantining future files. Uploading the hash of each file is a great way to create a custom detection tile list.
CA
Carrol 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gabriele
Creating an advanced custom detection with uploaded file hashes definitely sounds like the way to go.
AL
Alyssa 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gabriele
Using the simple custom detection feature and adding each detection to the list could be time-consuming.
TY
Tyra 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gabriele
I agree, it seems like the most comprehensive approach to detecting and quarantining future files.
CH
Chan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gabriele
I think option C is the best choice. Uploading the hash of each file for custom detection is a smart move.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel