Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 350-601 Exam - Topic 5 Question 81 Discussion

Posted by Benton on Sep 19, 2024 at 01:27 PM

An engineer is implementing VSANs on a Cisco MDS 9000 Series Switch with a native Fibre Channel. The deployment must meet these requirements:

* The host on port fc1/1 must be assigned to VSAN 10.

* The port channel 10 ISL must pass multiple VSANs, including VSAN 10.

Which configuration set meets these requirements?

Get Premium 350-601 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
JA
Jaime 11 months ago
I’m surprised this is even a question, it’s pretty straightforward!
NI
Nikita 11 months ago
I think D is missing some key steps.
PE
Pearly 11 months ago
Wait, isn't filtering all VSANs on the ISL a bad idea?
LA
Lai 11 months ago
I agree, B is the way to go!
MA
Mattie 12 months ago
Option B seems to cover all the requirements.
KA
Kathrine 12 months ago
I don't think we should disable VSAN 1; that seems risky. Option D might not be the right choice after all.
TA
Tasia 1 year ago
I feel like option C is close, but filtering all VSANs on the ISL seems wrong since we need to allow VSAN 10.
TA
Tabetha 1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we had to bind a VSAN to an interface, so option B sounds familiar, but I can't recall if we need to enable trunking on the ISL.
SA
Samuel 1 year ago
I think we need to activate VSAN 10 in the vFC interface for it to work properly, but I'm not sure about the encapsulation part.
DA
Daniela 1 year ago
The key here is to properly associate VSAN 10 with the host port and enable VSAN trunking on the ISL. I think option B looks like the best approach to meet all the requirements.
CO
Cora 1 year ago
I'm a little confused about the VSAN trunking configuration. Do we need to enable it on the ISL or the port channel members? I want to make sure I don't miss anything.
IO
Iola 1 year ago
Okay, let's break this down step-by-step. We need to configure the host port, the port channel, and the VSAN trunking. I think I've got a good handle on this.
KE
Kerry 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before attempting to solve it.
ET
Ettie 1 year ago
This is a good test of our VSAN knowledge. I'm feeling confident I can work through this step-by-step and select the right configuration set.
HI
Hildred 1 year ago
I recall that we discussed the order of the commands; I think it's important to match the columns correctly too. There was a practice question like this!
MA
Maryann 2 years ago
Option B all the way! It's the most straightforward and follows the requirements to a T. Plus, who doesn't love a good VSAN database?
KE
Keneth 2 years ago
Option C seems a bit convoluted. Configuring the VSAN in the interface and then attaching it to the VSAN database? Come on, keep it simple!
DA
Dahlia 2 years ago
Haha, option D is definitely a trap. Disabling VSAN 1 and allowing VSAN 10 in the FLOGI database? That's just weird.
IZ
Izetta 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dahlia
User 3: Option B looks like the correct configuration set for the requirements.
TE
Telma 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dahlia
Yeah, it doesn't make sense to disable VSAN 1 and allow VSAN 10 in the FLOGI database.
GA
Galen 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dahlia
I agree, option D seems like a trap.
GE
German 2 years ago
I don't know, option A looks good too. Activating the VSAN on the virtual Fibre Channel interface and setting the encapsulation to EISL on the switch port could also work.
GW
Gwenn 2 years ago
↳ replying to German
Option A does seem like a solid configuration. Setting encapsulation EISL on the switch port is crucial for passing multiple VSANs.
DO
Dominga 2 years ago
↳ replying to German
I see your point. Option A does have some valid steps to meet the requirements. It's a tough decision between A and B.
DO
Dottie 2 years ago
↳ replying to German
Yeah, I agree. Associating VSAN 10 to interface vfc 1/1 and enabling vsan F-port-channel-trunk on the ISL should meet the requirements.
RE
Remedios 2 years ago
↳ replying to German
Option A could work as well. Activating VSAN 10 in the vFC interface and associating it to interface vfc 1/1 might be a good approach.
RE
Rex 2 years ago
↳ replying to German
I agree, option B seems like the most appropriate configuration. Binding VSAN 10 to interface fc1/1 in the VSAN database is crucial.
ST
Steffanie 2 years ago
↳ replying to German
I think option A is the best choice. Activating VSAN 10 on the vFC interface seems like the right move.
DO
Douglass 2 years ago
↳ replying to German
I think option B is the best choice. Creating VSAN 10 in the VSAN database and enabling VSAN trunking on the ISL should meet the requirements.
MI
Mike 2 years ago
Because activating VSAN 10 in the vFC interface and associating it to interface vfc 1/1 seems to meet the requirements.
AD
Adela 2 years ago
Why do you think option A is correct?
MI
Mike 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the right one.
DI
Dierdre 2 years ago
Option B seems to be the correct answer. Creating the VSAN, binding it to the interface, and enabling VSAN trunking on the ISL with VSAN 10 allowed should meet the requirements.
JO
Jovita 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dierdre
Agreed, creating the VSAN, binding it to the interface, and enabling VSAN trunking on the ISL with VSAN 10 allowed seems to meet the requirements.
KA
Karan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dierdre
I think option B is the right choice.
AD
Adela 2 years ago
I think the correct configuration is option B.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel