MENU
A network operator working for a private outsourcing company with an employee id: 4261:72:778 needs to limit the malicious traffic on their network. Which configuration must the engineer use to implement URPF loose mode on the GigabitEthernet0/1 interface?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 350-501 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
JI
Jillian
2 months ago
I prefer option C. It allows flexibility with IPv6 while being strict on IPv4.
HY
Hyun
2 months ago
I feel option D is more balanced. It uses "any" for IPv4 and "rx" for IPv6.
TA
Tamie
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It covers both IPv4 and IPv6 correctly.
JA
Jani
2 months ago
I didn't realize URPF could be so tricky!
MA
Margery
3 months ago
Wait, why would you use "reachable-via rx"? That seems off.
LA
Lang
3 months ago
Definitely A! It's the only one with "reachable-via any" for both IPs.
CO
Corinne
3 months ago
I think D might actually work too, but not sure.
MA
Maia
3 months ago
Option A is the correct choice for URPF loose mode.
WI
Winfred
3 months ago
I think option A looks good because it uses "any" for both IPv4 and IPv6, but I’m not completely confident about the syntax.
PE
Pete
3 months ago
I’m confused about the difference between "reachable-via any" and "reachable-via rx." I feel like I might have mixed them up in my notes.
VI
Viki
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, but I’m not sure if "rx" is the right choice for IPv6. It feels like it could be a trick.
PE
Pearly
4 months ago
I think URPF loose mode allows traffic from any source as long as it's reachable, so I’m leaning towards options that use "any" for verification.