Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 350-501 Exam - Topic 3 Question 108 Discussion

Posted by Kayleigh on Feb 10, 2025 at 10:38 PM

Refer to the exihibit.

Refer to the exhibit. The operations team is implementing an LDP-based configuration in the service provider core network with these requirements:

R1 must establish LDP peering with the loopback IP address as its Router-ID.

Session protection must be enabled on R2.

How must the team update the network configuration to successfully enable LDP peering between R1 and R2?

Suggested Answer: A

Solution

R3

router bgp 65413

add ipv4

nei 2.2.2.2 allowas-in

nei 4.4.4.4 allowas-in

add ipv6

nei 2001:db8:4:4:4::4 allowas-in

end

copy run start

=======================

R2

router bgp 65413

nei 1.1.1.1 as-override

nei 3.3.3.3 as-override

end

copy run start

=======================

R3

router bgp 65413

nei 10.3.4.2 remot 65412

nei 2001:db8:3:4::2 remot 65412

nei 2001:db8:4:4:4:4::4 remot 65412

nei 2001:db8:4:4:4:4::4 ebgp-multihop 10

add ip4

nei 10.3.4.2 act

ex

add ipv6

nei 2001:db8:4:4:4:4::4 activate

nei 2001:db8:4:4:4:4::4 ebgp-multihop 10

nei 2001:db8:3:4::2 act

end

copy run start

===================

R4

router bgp 65412

nei 10.3.4.1 remot 65413

nei 2001:db8:3:3:3:3::3 remot 65413

nei 2001:db8:3:3:3:3::3 ebgp-multihop 10

nei 2001:db8:3:4::1 remot 65413

add ipv4

nei 10.3.4.1 remot act

nei 10.3.4.1 prefix-limit 10

add ipv6

nei 2001:db8:3:3:3:3::3 activate

nei 2001:db8:3:3:3:3::3 ebgp-multihop 10

nei 2001:db8:3:3:3:3::3 prefix-limit 10

nei 2001:db8:3:4::1 activate

nei 2001:db8:3:4::1 prefix-limit 10

end

copy run start


Get Premium 350-501 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
TH
Thurman 11 months ago
Not sure if just configuring the router-id will do it.
HO
Howard 11 months ago
Session protection on R2 is a must, but B is still key.
GE
Gerald 11 months ago
Wait, why would we change the LDP password? Seems unnecessary.
BO
Bok 11 months ago
I agree, B makes the most sense here.
JA
Jame 12 months ago
Option B is definitely the way to go.
NA
Natalie 12 months ago
I vaguely remember that changing the LDP password isn't usually necessary for peering, so I'm leaning away from option A.
TA
Tamekia 1 year ago
I feel like the answer might be B, but I can't recall if the router ID needs to be set on both R1 and R2 or just R1.
NG
Ngoc 1 year ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this where we had to enable LDP session protection. I wonder if that means we need to configure it on R2 instead of R1.
VE
Veronique 1 year ago
I remember something about configuring the router ID for LDP, but I'm not sure if it has to be done on both routers or just one.
VE
Veda 1 year ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I'll focus on the specific requirements - router-ID for R1 and session protection for R2. I think I can nail this one.
LE
Leontine 1 year ago
I'm a little confused about the difference between the router-ID and the LDP discovery parameters. I'll need to double-check those in the exam prep material.
SH
Sherron 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The key is getting the router-ID set up correctly on R1. And then the session protection on R2. I think I can work through this.
AN
Antonio 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the session protection requirement. I'll need to review my notes on that.
LE
Leandro 1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward MPLS configuration question. I think I can handle this one.
LY
Lynette 1 year ago
Option D? Really? What is this, a trick question? Changing the default timers won't solve the LDP peering issue.
HA
Hassie 1 year ago
Haha, I bet the correct answer is hidden in the exhibit somewhere. Gotta love these tricky certification questions!
NO
Noe 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hassie
Jacinta: Sounds good, let's update the configuration accordingly.
JI
Jillian 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hassie
User 3: I agree, let's go with that option.
JA
Jacinta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hassie
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It mentions using the loopback IP address as the Router-ID.
TA
Tambra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hassie
User 1: I think the answer is B) Configure mpls ldp router-id loopback0 on R1 and R2.
CE
Celeste 1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I think B is the right answer. Changing the password or session protection configuration on just one router won't work.
BR
Brinda 1 year ago
I'm with Levi on this one. Configuring the LDP router-ID is crucial, and it's the only option that directly addresses the requirement.
MA
Man 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brinda
It's important to follow the requirements closely to ensure everything works as intended.
AL
Alpha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brinda
Definitely, that's the key to successfully enabling LDP peering between the two routers.
FL
Floyd 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brinda
I agree, configuring the LDP router-ID on both R1 and R2 is the way to go.
LE
Levi 2 years ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Setting the LDP router-ID on both R1 and R2 is key to establishing the peering session.
PA
Paola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Levi
Yes, that's correct. It ensures that the peering session is established successfully.
BA
Barbra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Levi
I agree, setting the LDP router-ID on both R1 and R2 is crucial for the peering session.
GL
Glendora 2 years ago
I'm not sure about that. Maybe we should also consider enabling LDP session protection on R1 for added security.
AR
Argelia 2 years ago
I agree with Robt. Setting the router-id to loopback0 will ensure successful LDP peering.
RO
Robt 2 years ago
I think the answer is B) Configure mpls ldp router-id loopback0 on R1 and R2.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel