Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 350-501 Exam - Topic 2 Question 107 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.ASN 64501 currently reaches the networks under the 10.0.0.0/8 prefix via the North_B router, which is a slow backup link. The administrator of ASN 64502 wants traffic from ASN 64501 to 10.0.0.0/8 to travel via the primary link North_
B) Advertise the 10.0.0.0/8 prefix through North_B and specific subnets through North_A
A) Which change to the network configuration accomplishes this task?
A) Set a higher local preference between North_A and South_A
C) Set a Lower Weight value for incoming traffic on North_A
D) Set a lower MED between North_B and South_B

Cisco 350-501 Exam - Topic 2 Question 107 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-501 exam
Question #: 107
Topic #: 2
[All 350-501 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

ASN 64501 currently reaches the networks under the 10.0.0.0/8 prefix via the North_B router, which is a slow backup link. The administrator of ASN 64502 wants traffic from ASN 64501 to 10.0.0.0/8 to travel via the primary link North_

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To mitigate DDoS attacks in a BGP environment, an engineer can apply BGP FlowSpec, which allows for the creation of traffic filtering policies that can be distributed across the network.This configuration enables the network to respond quickly to DDoS attacks by filtering or redirecting malicious traffic based on predefined criteria, such as source IP, destination IP, and port numbers456.


by Annette at Jan 24, 2025, 09:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 350-501 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gladys
9 months ago
Definitely agree with setting a higher local preference!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure North_A is actually faster?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
10 months ago
Lowering the MED might not change much in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
10 months ago
I think advertising through North_B is a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
10 months ago
Higher local preference for North_A is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
10 months ago
Setting a lower weight value for incoming traffic on North_A seems like it could work, but I’m not confident about how that interacts with the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
11 months ago
I feel like advertising the 10.0.0.0/8 prefix through North_B might just complicate things instead of solving the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
11 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to manipulate BGP attributes, but I can't recall if lowering the MED would really make a difference here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
11 months ago
I think setting a higher local preference between North_A and South_A could help prioritize that link, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
11 months ago
I'm a bit uncertain about this one. I'll need to draw out the network topology and review the BGP decision process to determine the best way to influence the path selection. Hopefully, I can eliminate a few of the options and narrow it down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
11 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. I'd go with option B - advertising the 10.0.0.0/8 prefix through North_B and the specific subnets through North_A. That should ensure the primary link is used for the majority of the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to figure out how to make the North_A link the preferred path for traffic from ASN 64501 to the 10.0.0.0/8 prefix. I'll need to consider things like local preference, MED, and weight to see which option is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand the exact problem and what the options are trying to accomplish.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky BGP configuration question. I'll need to carefully review the information provided and think through the different BGP attributes that could be used to influence the path selection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
1 year ago
Wait, wait, wait... Did they just say 'North_B' is a 'slow backup link'? That's like putting a turbo on a horse-drawn carriage!
upvoted 0 times
Candra
1 year ago
User4: Or advertising specific subnets through North_A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
1 year ago
User3: Maybe setting a higher local preference would help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
1 year ago
User2: I know right, they need to fix that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
1 year ago
User1: Yeah, that's definitely not ideal.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
France
1 year ago
Nah, I don't think setting a lower Weight value for incoming traffic on North_A is the right move here. Seems a bit too complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
1 year ago
Oh, wait, hold on. Wouldn't setting a lower MED between North_B and South_B also work? That's an interesting approach.
upvoted 0 times
Daryl
1 year ago
User 3: I think both options could achieve the desired outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that could be another way to route the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
1 year ago
User 1: Setting a lower MED between North_B and South_B could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gianna
1 year ago
I'm not so sure about that. Setting a higher local preference between North_A and South_A seems like the most straightforward solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
Mabel
1 year ago
User 3: Setting a lower Weight value for incoming traffic on North_A could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
1 year ago
User 2: Maybe, but what about advertising the 10.0.0.0/8 prefix through North_B and specific subnets through North_A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
1 year ago
User 1: I think setting a higher local preference between North_A and South_A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Britt
1 year ago
I agree with Chanel, B seems like the correct choice because it mentions advertising specific subnets through North_A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
1 year ago
Hmm, I think option B is the way to go. Advertising the 10.0.0.0/8 prefix through North_B while sending the specific subnets through North_A should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Lorenza
1 year ago
User 4: Let's go with option B then, it seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
1 year ago
User 3: Setting a higher local preference might also work, but I think option B is more specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that would definitely help route the traffic the way we want.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, option B seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chanel
1 year ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel