MENU
A remote operation center is deploying a set of l-BGP and E-BGP connections for multiple IOS-XR platforms using the same template. The l-BGP sessions exchange prefixes with no apparent issues, but the E-BGP sessions do not exchange routes. What causes this issue?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 350-501 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
SH
Shoshana
12 months ago
No way, I thought the HELLO packets were only for l-BGP!
LO
Lorita
12 months ago
Yeah, the default policy can block route exchanges. Makes sense!
NA
Nana
1 year ago
Wait, are you saying the l-BGP neighbors are mistyped? That sounds odd.
CY
Cyril
1 year ago
I think it's definitely a policy issue with the E-BGP neighbors.
DY
Dyan
1 year ago
E-BGP needs next-hop-self for proper route exchange.
DE
Delfina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know SSH uses port 22, but I'm not 100% certain about the HTTPS port. Let me think this through carefully.
CH
Christa
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully think through the potential for an infinite loop and how the platform might handle that.
EL
Elouise
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the different network tools, so I'm not 100% sure on this one. I'll have to think it through carefully.
AM
Amina
1 year ago
"Competitive differentiation" seems off, but I have a vague recollection of it relating to pricing strategies in our discussions.
OM
Omer
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I know RAID 1+0 provides redundancy through mirroring, so that could help with random writes. And I think RAID 1+0 has lower processing overhead compared to RAID 5/6. I'll go with those two.
CL
Clari55a
4 years ago
C. Is correct.