MENU
Which network design principle should be followed to improve Layer 2 stability in an enterprise campus design?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 350-401 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
BO
Bobbye
6 months ago
I feel like D might be safer for scalability.
CR
Crista
6 months ago
B makes sense. Only what you need, right?
DO
Dottie
6 months ago
A could lead to issues. Too many VLANs can confuse things.
CA
Carmelina
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards D. Aggregation layer is crucial.
AL
Alfreda
7 months ago
Agreed! Less complexity means more stability.
GU
Gussie
7 months ago
I think B is the best choice. Keeps things simple.
CL
Claudia
7 months ago
I thought extending VLANs in the core was standard practice?
ET
Ettie
7 months ago
B keeps things clean and efficient.
JE
Jerry
7 months ago
Surprised that people still think A is a good idea!
MA
Margot
8 months ago
I disagree, A could work too if managed well.
RY
Ryan
8 months ago
B is definitely the way to go!
PR
Providencia
8 months ago
Extending all user VLANs throughout the core layer? C'mon, that's just asking for trouble. Layer 2 stability is like a delicate flower, gotta nurture it.
SH
Sherly
8 months ago
Option B) is the clear winner here. Who needs a bunch of unnecessary VLANs clogging up the access layer? Not this network engineer!
DI
Dierdre
9 months ago
Hmm, I'd have to go with B). Extending only the necessary VLANs is the way to maintain that sweet, sweet Layer 2 stability.
MI
Mi
9 months ago
A) Extending all user VLANs throughout the access layer? That's a recipe for disaster! Layer 2 nightmare waiting to happen.
AL
Aliza
9 months ago
D) Extending only required user VLANs throughout the aggregation layer sounds like the best option to me. Gotta keep that Layer 2 stability in check.
AL
Allene
9 months ago
B) Extending only required user VLANs throughout the access layer is the way to go. Keeps things clean and simple.
LA
Lashaunda
9 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of only extending necessary VLANs, so I think B makes the most sense for stability.
HA
Harris
9 months ago
I want to say A is wrong because extending all VLANs could lead to instability, but I can't recall the exact reason.
IV
Ivette
10 months ago
Ah, I see now - extending only the required VLANs is likely the best approach to maintain Layer 2 stability. That makes sense based on the design principles we covered.
PR
Precious
10 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the difference between the aggregation and core layers in this context. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the implications.
AR
Arthur
10 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and I chose D back then. But now I'm confused about the aggregation layer vs. access layer.
GL
Gladys
10 months ago
I think it might be B, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember something about minimizing broadcast domains.
LY
Lynelle
10 months ago
Extending all VLANs throughout the access layer sounds like it could lead to a lot of unnecessary traffic and potential issues. I'll have to consider the other options.
MA
Maurine
11 months ago
Okay, I remember learning about VLAN design in the access layer. I think the key is to minimize the number of VLANs extended to improve stability.
GA
Gaston
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different layer 2 design principles and how they impact stability.
AN
Antonio
5 months ago
I agree, less complexity means better performance.
DE
Derrick
6 months ago
Yeah, too many VLANs can cause issues.
NE
Nelida
6 months ago
I think extending only required VLANs is the way to go.
DY
Dyan
11 months ago
Extending all VLANs just complicates the network.
VI
Vivan
11 months ago
Definitely, it keeps things simpler and more stable.