Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 350-201 Exam - Topic 9 Question 28 Discussion

A security expert is investigating a breach that resulted in a $32 million loss from customer accounts. Hackers were able to steal API keys and two-factor codes due to a vulnerability that was introduced in a new code a few weeks before the attack. Which step was missed that would have prevented this breach?
D) use of SecDevOps to detect the vulnerability during development
A) use of the Nmap tool to identify the vulnerability when the new code was deployed
B) implementation of a firewall and intrusion detection system
C) implementation of an endpoint protection system

Cisco 350-201 Exam - Topic 9 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-201 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 9
[All 350-201 Questions]

A security expert is investigating a breach that resulted in a $32 million loss from customer accounts. Hackers were able to steal API keys and two-factor codes due to a vulnerability that was introduced in a new code a few weeks before the attack. Which step was missed that would have prevented this breach?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Willard at May 03, 2022, 10:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 350-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
King
9 months ago
I think endpoint protection is overrated in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
10 months ago
Wow, $32 million? That's a huge loss!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
10 months ago
A firewall alone wouldn't have stopped this breach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
10 months ago
Not sure if Nmap would have caught that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
10 months ago
Definitely should have used SecDevOps during development!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
10 months ago
I vaguely recall that SecDevOps focuses on security in the development lifecycle, so D sounds like it could be the missed step here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think implementing a firewall is crucial, but it seems like the main issue was with the development process itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like using Nmap could help identify vulnerabilities after deployment, which might not have been enough in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
11 months ago
I remember studying the importance of integrating security during the development phase, so I think D might be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to review the differences between Azure Monitor, Azure Advisor, and Application Insights to decide which one is most appropriate for comparing cloud usage to industry standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the dladm command is used for network administration, but I'm not sure about the specific link types it supports. I'll need to make an educated guess on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through step-by-step to make sure I understand the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel