MENU
Which command does an engineer use to set read/write/execute access on a folder for everyone who reaches the resource?
Suggested Answer: A, D
Get Premium 350-201 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
MI
Miles
11 months ago
Wait, can you really give everyone execute access? That seems odd.
XO
Xochitl
11 months ago
777 gives everyone everything. That's risky!
AN
Annmarie
11 months ago
No way, 777 is too open!
AL
Alpha
11 months ago
I thought it was 775? Seems like a safer option.
AV
Avery
12 months ago
It's definitely chmod 777 for full access.
LA
Lanie
12 months ago
I definitely remember that 777 allows all permissions, but I wonder if there’s a specific context where another option might be better.
BR
Brock
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought 666 was for read/write only, so it can't be the answer for execute access.
LA
Larue
1 year ago
I remember practicing with chmod commands, and I feel like 775 might be close, but it doesn't give full access to everyone.
LO
Long
1 year ago
I think the command for full access is chmod 777, but I'm not completely sure if that's the right one for everyone.
HA
Harrison
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is D. Chmod 777 is the standard command for setting full permissions for everyone on a folder or file.
PA
Paola
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know we want to give everyone full access, so I'm leaning towards D. But I want to double-check the other options just to be sure.
RO
Royal
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know chmod is used to set permissions, but I'm not sure which of these options is the right one for giving everyone full access.
HE
Herminia
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the answer is D, chmod 777, since that would give everyone full read/write/execute access.
DE
Denae
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the different options here. I'll need to review my notes on chmod commands to make sure I choose the right one.
GR
Graham
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused here. Since car1 is set to reject, will that cause the entire Promise.race() to fail, or will it still return the first resolved promise? I'll need to double-check the documentation on how Promise.race() handles rejections.
FR
Francoise
1 year ago
This is a good test of our knowledge of OSHA regulations. I feel confident I can eliminate a few of these options and then carefully consider the remaining choices to select the best answer.
LA
Lavonna
1 year ago
Using Bidirectional Forwarding Detection could be a good choice to improve convergence, but I'm not sure if that's the best option here.
NE
Nenita
1 year ago
I'm going with option D, chmod 777. After all, what's the point of having a folder if everyone can't access it like it's their own personal playground?
AL
Alverta
1 year ago
Good idea. It's always important to balance convenience with security when setting permissions.
RA
Rasheeda
1 year ago
I see your point. Maybe it's better to use a more restricted permission like chmod 775 instead.
SH
Shawnta
1 year ago
That's true, but be careful with giving full access to everyone. It can pose security risks.
ST
Stephen
1 year ago
I'm going with option D, chmod 777. After all, what's the point of having a folder if everyone can't access it like it's their own personal playground?
PO
Pok
1 year ago
Ah, the classic chmod 666 - 'The Number of the Beast' permissions. Perfect for when you want to let the demons in your folder have a field day.
VI
Viola
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old question of permissions. I reckon chmod 774 is the way to go. Let the owner have all the power, and the group can read and write. Everyone else can just look, but not touch.
VI
Vilma
1 year ago
I usually go with chmod 775 to allow the owner to do everything, the group to read and write, and others to only read.
AN
Annabelle
1 year ago
I prefer chmod 777 so that everyone has full access to the folder.
BE
Bette
1 year ago
I think chmod 774 is a good choice too. It gives the right balance of access.
TA
Tambra
1 year ago
I'm going with option C, chmod 775. That way, the owner and the group have full access, and everyone else can read and execute. Seems like a good balance.
DA
Danilo
1 year ago
Yeah, chmod 775 seems like the best option for setting permissions on a folder.
TW
Twila
1 year ago
I think chmod 777 would give too much access to everyone.
VA
Valentin
1 year ago
I agree, chmod 775 is a good choice for balancing access.
CH
Chi
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) chmod 775 because it gives read/write/execute access to the owner and group, and only read/execute access to others.
SI
Simona
2 years ago
Hmm, I think chmod 777 is the way to go. Everyone should have full access, right? What could possibly go wrong?
DE
Delfina
1 year ago
User 2: I agree. It's better to use chmod 775 to give read/write/execute access to the owner and group, and only read/execute access to others.
KE
Kenda
1 year ago
User 1: I think chmod 777 is too permissive. It gives everyone full control.
KE
Keva
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) chmod 777.
LU
Lucille
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) chmod 666.