Discuss Cisco 350-201 Exam Topic 6 Question 116

Refer to the exhibit.

Cisco Advanced Malware Protection installed on an end-user desktop has automatically submitted a low prevalence file to the Threat Grid analysis engine for further analysis. What should be concluded from this report?

AThe prioritized behavioral indicators of compromise do not justify the execution of the ''ransomware'' because the scores do not indicate the likelihood of malicious ransomware.

BThe prioritized behavioral indicators of compromise do not justify the execution of the ''ransomware'' because the scores are high and do not indicate the likelihood of malicious ransomware.

CThe prioritized behavioral indicators of compromise justify the execution of the ''ransomware'' because the
scores are high and indicate the likelihood that malicious ransomware has been detected.

DThe prioritized behavioral indicators of compromise justify the execution of the ''ransomware'' because the scores are low and indicate the likelihood that malicious ransomware has been detected.

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 350-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

30 comments · newest first

Andrew 6 months ago

C is definitely justified. We can't ignore high scores!

Louisa 6 months ago

I feel like A is safer. Better to be cautious.

Joesph 6 months ago

D is confusing. Low scores shouldn't indicate a threat.

Annabelle 7 months ago

C is the way to go! High scores mean we should act.

Hannah 7 months ago

I disagree, B seems right. High scores shouldn't trigger ransomware.

Mignon 7 months ago

Totally agree with A, the scores don’t support a ransomware threat.

Stephanie 7 months ago

Wait, how can low scores indicate ransomware? Sounds off.

Jess 7 months ago

No way, I’m leaning towards option C!

Gerardo 8 months ago

I think option A makes the most sense here.

Bobbie 8 months ago

The file was low prevalence, so it might not be a big deal.

Nobuko 8 months ago

Ransomware? More like "ransom-wear" am I right? Anyway, Option A is the way to go.

Rickie 8 months ago

Haha, "execute the ransomware"? I think they meant "detect" the ransomware. Option A is the correct answer.

Karl 9 months ago

Hold up, why would low scores justify executing ransomware? That doesn't sound right. Option A is the way to go.

Berry 9 months ago

I think the answer is C because if the scores are high, it suggests a strong likelihood of ransomware. That aligns with what we discussed in class.

Jesusita 9 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the low vs. high scores. I thought low scores meant less likelihood of a threat, but I’m not entirely sure how that applies here.

Oneida 9 months ago

This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to decide based on behavioral indicators. I think high scores usually indicate a threat, right?

Caitlin 9 months ago

I remember studying how to interpret the scores from Threat Grid, but I'm not sure if high scores mean we should act immediately.

Timothy 9 months ago

Okay, I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The report is talking about indicators of compromise, so I'll need to focus on how those indicators relate to the likelihood of ransomware. I think I can eliminate a couple of the answer choices and then decide between the remaining options.

Paris 10 months ago

I think I've got a handle on this. The report is indicating that the file has been submitted for further analysis, so the answer is likely going to be about what that analysis shows. I'll need to carefully read through the options and see which one best matches the information provided.

Cordelia 10 months ago

Alright, let's break this down. The key seems to be understanding what the prioritized behavioral indicators of compromise are telling us about the likelihood of malicious ransomware. I'll need to pay close attention to the scores and how they relate to the answer choices.

Ernestine 10 months ago

I think option A makes sense. Low scores mean low risk.

Dean 10 months ago

Option A seems more logical. The low prevalence score suggests the file is not likely to be malicious ransomware.

Wayne 11 months ago

I agree, Option A makes the most sense. The scores don't indicate a high likelihood of ransomware.

Scarlet 11 months ago

Okay, let's see here. The question is asking what we should conclude from the Threat Grid report, and the answers seem to be talking about whether the indicators of compromise justify the execution of ransomware. I'm a bit confused about that part.

Audria 11 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the report and the answer choices to figure out what the right conclusion is.

Erasmo 6 months ago

↳ replying to Audria

Same here! High scores would be a different story.

Lauran 6 months ago

↳ replying to Audria

I’m leaning towards option A. It makes sense with low scores.

Lajuana 6 months ago

↳ replying to Audria

Yeah, but we have to watch out for the indicators of compromise too.

Isadora 10 months ago

↳ replying to Audria

This is definitely tricky! I think we need to focus on the scores.

Bette 11 months ago

↳ replying to Audria

Agreed! Low scores usually mean less risk, right?

Cisco 350-201 Exam - Topic 6 Question 116 Discussion