Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 350-201 Exam - Topic 11 Question 126 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Cisco Advanced Malware Protection installed on an end-user desktop automatically submitted a low prevalence file to the Threat Grid analysis engine. What should be concluded from this report?
B) Threat scores are low, malicious ransomware has been detected, and files have been modified
A) Threat scores are high, malicious ransomware has been detected, and files have been modified
C) Threat scores are high, malicious activity is detected, but files have not been modified
D) Threat scores are low and no malicious file activity is detected

Cisco 350-201 Exam - Topic 11 Question 126 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-201 exam
Question #: 126
Topic #: 11
[All 350-201 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Cisco Advanced Malware Protection installed on an end-user desktop automatically submitted a low prevalence file to the Threat Grid analysis engine. What should be concluded from this report?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Vincenza
3 days ago
I feel like A is too extreme. High threat scores with modified files?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
8 days ago
C is possible, but I lean towards D. Low prevalence suggests safety.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
13 days ago
But what if it's C? High threat scores could indicate something serious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
19 days ago
I agree, D makes sense. No malicious activity detected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
24 days ago
I think it's D. Low threat scores mean no real danger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
29 days ago
Wait, how can they submit a file if there's no malicious activity?
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 month ago
I agree, D makes the most sense. Low threat and no activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
1 month ago
Definitely leaning towards option D here. No malicious activity detected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
1 month ago
I doubt that! Low scores but still submitting files? Seems fishy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
2 months ago
Looks like the threat scores are low, so probably no big deal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
2 months ago
I recall that low prevalence doesn't always mean safe, but it could lean towards D. Still, I’m a bit confused about the threat scores.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like if it was ransomware, the threat scores would be high. So maybe A or C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
2 months ago
I think I saw a similar question where low threat scores meant no malicious activity was detected. Could it be D again?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
2 months ago
I remember studying that low prevalence files usually indicate less risk, so maybe D is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel