Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 350-201 Exam - Topic 1 Question 103 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Based on the detected vulnerabilities, what is the next recommended mitigation step?
B) Perform root cause analysis for all detected vulnerabilities.
A) Evaluate service disruption and associated risk before prioritizing patches.
C) Remediate all vulnerabilities with descending CVSS score order.
D) Temporarily shut down unnecessary services until patch deployment ends.

Cisco 350-201 Exam - Topic 1 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-201 exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 1
[All 350-201 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Based on the detected vulnerabilities, what is the next recommended mitigation step?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Domonique at Dec 11, 2024, 03:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 350-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Launa
9 months ago
Root cause analysis is key, B should be considered first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
9 months ago
Wait, shutting down services? D sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
10 months ago
But what about service disruption? A seems important too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
10 months ago
Totally agree with C, gotta fix the worst ones first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
10 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense. Prioritize by CVSS score!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
10 months ago
Shutting down unnecessary services sounds like a good temporary measure, but I wonder if that’s too drastic. Option D might be a safe bet until we patch everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
11 months ago
I feel like we should focus on the CVSS scores, but I’m not confident if we should remediate all at once or prioritize. Option C seems logical, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
11 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to analyze vulnerabilities, and I think performing root cause analysis was important. So, option B could be right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
11 months ago
I think we discussed prioritizing patches based on risk, so maybe option A makes sense? But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
11 months ago
I think the best approach here is to perform a thorough root cause analysis first, then prioritize the patches accordingly. That's the safest way to proceed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the options. I'll need to make sure I understand the differences between the mitigation steps before choosing one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to prioritize the vulnerabilities based on risk and impact, not just CVSS scores.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the details and think through the potential impacts of each mitigation step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the options and the context of the detected vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
2 years ago
Didn't they teach you in IT school to always read the fine print? The exhibit is clearly just a picture of a cat. I'm going with Option E: Adopt the cat and forget about the vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
Ira
2 years ago
Carlee: Definitely, we need to be strategic in our approach to mitigating vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
2 years ago
User 2: I agree, it's important to consider the impact before taking action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
2 years ago
User 1: I think we should evaluate service disruption and associated risk before prioritizing patches.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elvera
2 years ago
In my opinion, we should remediate all vulnerabilities with descending CVSS score order to address the most critical ones first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
2 years ago
Ah, the age-old question - do we go for the quick fix or the thorough analysis? I say, why not both? Multitasking is key!
upvoted 0 times
Micaela
2 years ago
C) Remediate all vulnerabilities with descending CVSS score order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
2 years ago
B) Perform root cause analysis for all detected vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 years ago
A) Evaluate service disruption and associated risk before prioritizing patches.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vi
2 years ago
I believe we should also consider performing root cause analysis for all detected vulnerabilities to prevent future incidents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonie
2 years ago
I agree with Willetta, it's important to assess the impact before applying patches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
2 years ago
Option D sounds tempting, but temporarily shutting down services could cause more problems than it solves. Not a fan of that one.
upvoted 0 times
Merlyn
2 years ago
Let's focus on remediating vulnerabilities with the highest CVSS score first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
2 years ago
Root cause analysis is important to understand the vulnerabilities better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
2 years ago
I think we should prioritize patches based on risk before anything else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charolette
2 years ago
I agree, shutting down services could lead to more issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willetta
2 years ago
I think the next recommended mitigation step is to evaluate service disruption and associated risk before prioritizing patches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A seems like a safer bet - evaluating the service disruption risk first is prudent.
upvoted 0 times
Ena
2 years ago
User 1: I think option A is a good idea, we should evaluate the risk before prioritizing patches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
2 years ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to consider the potential service disruption.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lourdes
2 years ago
I think Option C is the best here. Remediating all vulnerabilities in descending CVSS order is the most comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
Brandon
2 years ago
I see your point, but we should also consider temporarily shutting down unnecessary services for security reasons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
2 years ago
That's a good point, but I still think remediating vulnerabilities in descending order is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
2 years ago
But wouldn't it be better to evaluate service disruption first before prioritizing patches?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
2 years ago
I agree, Option C seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel