Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-820 Exam - Topic 27 Question 111 Discussion

Posted by Theola on May 08, 2026 at 03:54 AM

A company identifies a fraudulent toil situation. An engineer reviews the Cisco UCM call detail records and discovers that fraudulent calls originate from a Cisco Expressway-C server and are then routed to a 10-digit PSTN number. What must be configured to limit incoming Expressway calls to the internal Cisco UCM range of extensions 5XXXX?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 300-820 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
23 comments · newest first
CA
Candida 17 days ago
Exactly! C is the way to go for precise control.
JU
Jutta 22 days ago
D seems too general as well. We need specificity here.
SH
Sherell 27 days ago
I’m not sure about B. It feels irrelevant to the call routing issue.
MO
Mozell 1 month ago
C makes sense. Regex can be powerful for this situation.
CA
Candida 1 month ago
But A might be too broad. We need to limit it to 5XXXX.
FA
Fausto 1 month ago
I’m leaning towards A. It seems to cover all partitions effectively.
MI
Mica 2 months ago
I agree! I think option C is the best choice. It specifically targets the internal range.
AR
Art 2 months ago
This question is tricky. I feel like it’s testing our understanding of call routing.
RU
Ruth 2 months ago
But A might allow unwanted calls. C is safer.
LI
Lizette 2 months ago
I’m leaning towards A too. It covers all partitions.
BA
Barney 2 months ago
C is specific and effective. Regex helps narrow it down.
LA
Launa 2 months ago
A seems too broad. We need to limit calls specifically.
MA
Marg 3 months ago
I feel like C is the right choice. It targets the internal range directly.
GE
Georgeanna 3 months ago
This question is tricky. I think option A makes sense.
BE
Benedict 3 months ago
A is correct, but don't forget about the partitions!
SH
Sherman 3 months ago
I disagree, D seems too broad for this situation.
LA
Latanya 3 months ago
Wait, can we really limit calls like that? Sounds tricky.
AS
Ashanti 3 months ago
I think C is the way to go, regex is key here!
EV
Evan 4 months ago
Definitely A, you need that calling search space for proper routing.
CL
Clare 4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A because it seems to align with limiting calls to specific extensions, but I wish I had more clarity on the other options.
MO
Mollie 5 months ago
I think the answer might be related to call policy rules, but I’m confused between options B and D. They both mention regex patterns, which makes it tricky.
CA
Carry 6 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where regex patterns were involved. Option C sounds familiar, but I can't recall the exact details.
PA
Patrick 6 months ago
I remember we discussed something about calling search spaces in class. I think option A might be the right choice, but I'm not entirely sure.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel