Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-815 Exam - Topic 1 Question 102 Discussion

Posted by Maia on Nov 13, 2024 at 07:21 PM

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. Users report that outgoing calls do not work on the new SIP trunk for outgoing calls. The solution consists of a Cisco UCM Cluster linked to a Cisco Unified Border Element where the SIP trunk is terminated. The provider required 10 digits. The logs show a line going toward the Cisco Unified Border Element. Which code snippet must be added to the configuration to meet the requirement?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 300-815 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
SH
Shenika 11 months ago
I agree with A, but it’s a bit confusing with all these choices.
LE
Leonardo 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about these options? They look similar.
FR
Frederic 11 months ago
Definitely going with D, it fits the requirement perfectly!
LA
Laticia 11 months ago
I think B is better for voice translation profiles.
LA
Lasandra 12 months ago
Option A seems like the right choice for SIP translation.
LE
Leonora 12 months ago
I think the answer is A, but I can't recall if we specifically used "request Invite" in our lab exercises. It feels familiar, though.
HO
Hollis 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between the SIP translation profile and the voice translation profile. Does anyone remember which one we used in practice?
LA
Lai 1 year ago
I remember a similar question where we had to adjust the SIP headers. I feel like option D might be the right choice since it mentions the request Invite.
WY
Wynell 1 year ago
I think we need to modify the SIP headers, but I'm not sure if it's under the SIP translation profile or the voice translation profile.
RO
Rosalind 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by all the different configuration options here. I'll need to reference my notes and make sure I understand the differences between the SIP, voice, and Diversion header modifications.
MA
Maryln 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The solution is to use the "request Invite sip-header modify" command under the SIP translation profile configuration. That should do the trick.
TR
Troy 1 year ago
Hmm, the key seems to be modifying the SIP header to meet the provider's 10-digit requirement. I'll need to double-check the syntax for the different configuration options.
CA
Casey 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky SIP configuration issue. I'll need to carefully review the details in the question and the options to determine the right approach.
CE
Cecilia 2 years ago
Haha, Option C sounds like a classic case of 'Diversion' tactics! I'll steer clear of that one.
TU
Tu 2 years ago
I see your point, but I still think A is the best choice because it specifically mentions the SIP translation profile configuration which is relevant to the scenario described in the question.
BE
Belen 2 years ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Modifying the SIP header in the voice translation profile seems more appropriate for this scenario.
EV
Evan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Belen
User3: Yeah, that seems like the most appropriate solution for the outgoing calls issue.
FE
Felice 2 years ago
↳ replying to Belen
User2: I agree, modifying the SIP header in the voice translation profile makes sense.
AL
Almeta 2 years ago
↳ replying to Belen
User1: I think Option D is the way to go.
RE
Refugia 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) sip-header modify <sip:1(...)@ <sip:9135551\\1@ under the voice translation profile configuration.
TE
Teddy 2 years ago
Option A seems like the way to go. It's a direct solution to the issue with the SIP trunk and the provider's requirement.
GA
Gail 2 years ago
↳ replying to Teddy
User4: Sounds good, let's implement the code snippet in option A for the configuration.
HI
Hildegarde 2 years ago
↳ replying to Teddy
User3: Let's go with option A then, it directly addresses the provider's requirement.
FR
Franklyn 2 years ago
↳ replying to Teddy
User2: I agree, modifying the SIP header in the translation profile should solve the issue.
RO
Rocco 2 years ago
↳ replying to Teddy
User1: I think option A is the best choice.
TU
Tu 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) request Invite sip-header modify <sip:1(...)@ <sip:9135551\\1@ under the SIP translation profile configuration.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel