Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-815 Exam - Topic 1 Question 102 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit. Users report that outgoing calls do not work on the new SIP trunk for outgoing calls. The solution consists of a Cisco UCM Cluster linked to a Cisco Unified Border Element where the SIP trunk is terminated. The provider required 10 digits. The logs show a line going toward the Cisco Unified Border Element. Which code snippet must be added to the configuration to meet the requirement?
C) request Invite sip-header Diversion modify '<sip:1(...)@' '<sip:9135551\1@' under the SIP profile configuration
A) request Invite sip-header modify '<sip:1(...)@' '<sip:9135551\1@' under the SIP translation profile configuration
B) sip-header modify '<sip:1(...)@' '<sip:9135551\1@' under the voice translation profile configuration
D) request Invite sip-header modify '<sip:1(...)@' '<sip:9135551\1@' under the voice translation profile configuration

Cisco 300-815 Exam - Topic 1 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-815 exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 1
[All 300-815 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. Users report that outgoing calls do not work on the new SIP trunk for outgoing calls. The solution consists of a Cisco UCM Cluster linked to a Cisco Unified Border Element where the SIP trunk is terminated. The provider required 10 digits. The logs show a line going toward the Cisco Unified Border Element. Which code snippet must be added to the configuration to meet the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Maia at Nov 13, 2024, 07:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-815 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shenika
9 months ago
I agree with A, but it’s a bit confusing with all these choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure about these options? They look similar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
10 months ago
Definitely going with D, it fits the requirement perfectly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
10 months ago
I think B is better for voice translation profiles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
10 months ago
Option A seems like the right choice for SIP translation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
10 months ago
I think the answer is A, but I can't recall if we specifically used "request Invite" in our lab exercises. It feels familiar, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between the SIP translation profile and the voice translation profile. Does anyone remember which one we used in practice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
11 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to adjust the SIP headers. I feel like option D might be the right choice since it mentions the request Invite.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
11 months ago
I think we need to modify the SIP headers, but I'm not sure if it's under the SIP translation profile or the voice translation profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by all the different configuration options here. I'll need to reference my notes and make sure I understand the differences between the SIP, voice, and Diversion header modifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The solution is to use the "request Invite sip-header modify" command under the SIP translation profile configuration. That should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
11 months ago
Hmm, the key seems to be modifying the SIP header to meet the provider's 10-digit requirement. I'll need to double-check the syntax for the different configuration options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky SIP configuration issue. I'll need to carefully review the details in the question and the options to determine the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
2 years ago
Haha, Option C sounds like a classic case of 'Diversion' tactics! I'll steer clear of that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
2 years ago
I see your point, but I still think A is the best choice because it specifically mentions the SIP translation profile configuration which is relevant to the scenario described in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. Modifying the SIP header in the voice translation profile seems more appropriate for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Evan
2 years ago
User3: Yeah, that seems like the most appropriate solution for the outgoing calls issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
2 years ago
User2: I agree, modifying the SIP header in the voice translation profile makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
2 years ago
User1: I think Option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Refugia
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) sip-header modify <sip:1(...)@ <sip:9135551\\1@ under the voice translation profile configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
2 years ago
Option A seems like the way to go. It's a direct solution to the issue with the SIP trunk and the provider's requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Gail
2 years ago
User4: Sounds good, let's implement the code snippet in option A for the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
2 years ago
User3: Let's go with option A then, it directly addresses the provider's requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
2 years ago
User2: I agree, modifying the SIP header in the translation profile should solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
2 years ago
User1: I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tu
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) request Invite sip-header modify <sip:1(...)@ <sip:9135551\\1@ under the SIP translation profile configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel