Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-715 Exam - Topic 3 Question 108 Discussion

Posted by Rodney on Mar 21, 2025 at 03:41 PM

Which compliance status is set when a matching posture policy has been defined for that endpomt. but all the mandatory requirements during posture assessment are not met?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 300-715 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
27 comments · newest first
BA
Barrie 10 months ago
I’m not so sure about that answer...
GR
Gracia 10 months ago
Wait, is "unknown" even an option?
CA
Cary 11 months ago
Yeah, non-compliant makes sense here.
AN
Annice 11 months ago
I thought it would be untrusted!
AP
Apolonia 11 months ago
It's definitely non-compliant.
WI
Winifred 11 months ago
I’m leaning towards "non-compliant" too, but I wonder if "unknown" could apply if the assessment didn’t fully complete.
RO
Rolland 11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like "unauthorized" could be a possibility, but it doesn't seem to fit this scenario.
TH
Thaddeus 12 months ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I remember something about "untrusted" being used when the device doesn't meet security standards.
CU
Curtis 12 months ago
I think the answer might be "non-compliant" since it sounds like the endpoint isn't meeting all the requirements.
JA
Jamika 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is C. non-compliant. The question is clear that the mandatory requirements weren't met, even though a policy was defined, so that seems to fit the description of a non-compliant status.
DA
Danica 1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. The key is to focus on the wording of the question and really understand what it's asking. If a matching posture policy has been defined, but the requirements aren't met, then the endpoint must be in a non-compliant state.
BE
Bernardine 1 year ago
Hmm, this one has me a bit stumped. I'm not entirely sure about the difference between the options like "unauthorized" and "non-compliant." I'll have to think this through carefully.
CA
Carmen 1 year ago
I think the answer is C. non-compliant, since the question states that the mandatory requirements during posture assessment are not met, even though a matching posture policy has been defined.
GO
Goldie 2 years ago
Haha, 'unknown' status? Really? That's like the IT guy saying 'I have no idea what's going on.' C is the obvious answer here.
ZO
Zona 1 year ago
↳ replying to Goldie
Agreed, C) non-compliant is the way to go.
FR
Franchesca 1 year ago
↳ replying to Goldie
Definitely not D) unknown, that just leaves too much uncertainty.
DA
Dana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Goldie
Yeah, it's like saying 'you didn't follow the rules.'
LO
Louann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Goldie
I think C) non-compliant makes the most sense.
FA
Fannie 2 years ago
I think B is the right choice. Untrusted status seems to fit the scenario better.
CO
Colton 2 years ago
C is the correct answer. Non-compliant status is set when the endpoint doesn't meet all the mandatory requirements during posture assessment.
AJ
Aja 1 year ago
↳ replying to Colton
C) non-compliant
LI
Lili 1 year ago
↳ replying to Colton
B) untrusted
RE
Reynalda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Colton
A) unauthorized
LU
Lucina 2 years ago
That's a good point, Roxane. It could also be unauthorized if access is restricted due to not meeting requirements.
RO
Roxane 2 years ago
But could it also be unauthorized if the endpoint is not meeting the requirements?
DO
Dorian 2 years ago
I agree with Lucina, if all mandatory requirements are not met, it makes sense to be non-compliant.
LU
Lucina 2 years ago
I think the compliance status would be non-compliant.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel