MENU
What is the minimum certainty factor when creating a profiler policy?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 300-715 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
When using separate PSNs for different sites, the network device must be added to all PSN nodes in the deployment, so that the device can communicate with the appropriate PSN based on the location of the user1. If the device is not added to all PSN nodes, the user may encounter an EAP-TLS authentication failure when moving between sites, as the device may not be able to reach the PSN that issued the certificate2. The other options are not relevant for this scenario, as they do not address the issue of PSN communication.
39 comments · newest first
WE
Werner
11 months ago
C is correct, just double-checked!
BR
Brittni
11 months ago
Wait, is it really C? That seems too low.
CA
Carry
11 months ago
No way, I always thought it was D!
NA
Nancey
11 months ago
I thought it was A, but C makes more sense.
FR
Frankie
12 months ago
It's definitely C, that's the standard.
JE
Jennie
12 months ago
I feel like the answer might be C, but I’m confused because I also remember something about maximum values from another practice question.
KI
Kirk
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where it was about the thresholds for device inclusion, and I think it was definitely about the minimum number.
GO
Golda
1 year ago
I remember something about predefined conditions, but I can't recall if it's about minimum or maximum values. This is tricky!
BL
Blondell
1 year ago
I think the minimum certainty factor relates to how low a device's score can be to still be included in the profile, but I'm not entirely sure.
SH
Shelba
1 year ago
I've got this one. The minimum certainty factor is the minimum number that a device's certainty factor must reach to become a member of the profile. Choice C is the correct answer.
MA
Marsha
1 year ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Is the minimum certainty factor the maximum or minimum number that a predefined condition provides? I'll have to double-check my notes.
FR
Francesco
1 year ago
Okay, I think I know the answer to this. The minimum certainty factor is the minimum number a device's certainty factor must reach to become a member of the profile.
LO
Lore
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll have to review the material on profiler policies.
KA
Kallie
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to think it through carefully.
TO
Tora
1 year ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. Based on what I know about Business Automation Insights, I think the answer is Summaries. I'll go with that.
AN
Antonio
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky MPLS question. I'll need to think it through carefully.
KY
Kyoko
1 year ago
The term "center of gravity" always confused me. Is it referring to where most resources are allocated? On-prem might have a stake in that, but I'm leaning towards the Provider option.
LI
Lisbeth
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it now. Option A is the way to go - create the constraint at the organization level and whitelist the trusted project. That way, only images from that project can be used for the boot disks. Seems like the most direct approach.
SA
Sabine
2 years ago
Wait, is this a trick question or something? I'm just going to guess C and hope for the best. Either that or I'll just ask the cat for the answer.
YV
Yvette
1 year ago
I'm going with C too, the minimum number that a device certainty factor must reach to become a member of the profile.
BA
Barb
1 year ago
I believe it's A, the minimum number that a predefined condition provides.
RO
Romana
1 year ago
I'm not sure, maybe it's D, the maximum number that a device certainty factor must reach to become a member of the profile.
RA
Raylene
1 year ago
I think it's C, the minimum number that a device certainty factor must reach to become a member of the profile.
BE
Bette
2 years ago
I'm going with B. The maximum number just makes sense, you know? I mean, who wants a bunch of low-certainty devices in their profile?
DA
Dana
1 year ago
Yeah, having a high minimum certainty factor ensures better accuracy in profiling.
AM
Amie
1 year ago
I agree, B does make sense. We want high-certainty devices in the profile.
FL
Floyd
2 years ago
I agree with Aron, because it makes sense that there should be a minimum threshold for devices to be included in the profile.
AR
Aron
2 years ago
I think it's C) the minimum number that a device certainty factor must reach to become a member of the profile.
DI
Diane
2 years ago
What is the minimum certainty factor when creating a profiler policy?
ED
Eden
2 years ago
D sounds about right to me. The devices have to reach a high enough number to be considered part of the profile. Anything less is just not good enough.
AN
Antonio
2 years ago
That makes sense, it wouldn't make sense for it to be the maximum number.
ER
Erick
2 years ago
I think it's C) the minimum number that a device certainty factor must reach to become a member of the profile.
JO
Jody
2 years ago
I'm pretty sure it's C. The devices have to meet a certain threshold to be part of the profile, right? Not like they can just join willy-nilly.
ER
Erasmo
1 year ago
So, it's important to set a threshold to maintain the accuracy and reliability of the profiler policy.
JE
Jerlene
1 year ago
Exactly, having a minimum certainty factor ensures that only devices with a certain level of confidence are included in the profile.
PO
Polly
1 year ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It wouldn't be effective if any device could just join without meeting a minimum requirement.
VI
Vincenza
1 year ago
I think you're right, it's C. The devices need to reach a certain certainty factor to be included in the profile.
KI
Kimberlie
2 years ago
A? That's gotta be a trick question. The minimum certainty factor would be the maximum, not the minimum. What is this, amateur hour?
AN
Antonio
2 years ago
What is the minimum certainty factor when creating a profiler policy?