Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-715 Exam - Topic 11 Question 113 Discussion

Posted by Alba on Jul 14, 2025 at 09:12 AM

An organization wants to split their Cisco ISE deployment to separate the device administration functionalities from the mam deployment. For this to work, the administrator must deregister any nodes that will become a part of the new deployment, but the button for this option is grayed out Which configuration is causing this behavior?

Get Premium 300-715 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
CA
Cary 10 months ago
Wow, I didn't know the Primary PAN was such a big deal!
MI
Mike 10 months ago
Definitely not D, synching shouldn't affect deregistration.
PR
Precious 10 months ago
Wait, could it be C? I thought failover nodes could be deregistered.
AL
Alverta 11 months ago
I agree, B makes the most sense here.
OL
Oliva 11 months ago
It's probably B, the Primary PAN can't be deregistered.
LE
Lettie 11 months ago
I feel like the synchronization aspect could be a factor too, but I can't recall if that relates directly to the grayed-out button. Maybe D?
KA
Kaycee 11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think it was about active nodes causing issues. Could it be A?
SH
Shala 11 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think if all nodes are in a failover setup, that could prevent deregistration. So, option C might be it?
CO
Corazon 12 months ago
I remember something about the Primary PAN being crucial for the deployment, so maybe option B is the right answer?
NI
Nickolas 12 months ago
I think the key here is to understand the current state of the Cisco ISE deployment. If all the nodes are actively being synced, that could be the reason the deregister button is unavailable. Gotta make sure everything is properly configured before making changes.
MA
Maryln 12 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. Are all the nodes participating in PAN auto failover? If so, that could also explain why the deregister button is grayed out - you can't remove nodes from that configuration.
CA
Cassandra 1 year ago
Okay, let me see. If one of the nodes is an active PSN, that would make sense why the deregister button is disabled. The PSN is a critical component, so you can't just remove it.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
Hmm, the question mentions something about separating device administration from the MAM deployment. That's an interesting requirement - I wonder if that's related to the issue with deregistering the nodes.
OC
Ocie 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the Cisco ISE deployment structure and node roles to figure out what could be causing the deregister button to be grayed out.
KE
Kenda 1 year ago
Ah, the joys of Cisco ISE deployments. I'm going to guess it's B. That Primary PAN is like the queen bee - you can't just deregister it willy-nilly!
KR
Kristofer 1 year ago
I see your point, Jenise. Let's go with B) One of the nodes is the Primary PAN as the most likely reason for the grayed out button.
TE
Terrilyn 1 year ago
Ha, this question is a real head-scratcher. I bet the answer is A - one of the nodes is an active PSN. Probably trying to keep that network service running, eh?
CH
Charlie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Terrilyn
User 2: No, I believe it's C - All of the nodes participate in the PAN auto failover.
CA
Carla 1 year ago
↳ replying to Terrilyn
User 1: I think the answer is B - One of the nodes is the Primary PAN.
JE
Jenise 1 year ago
It's possible, but I think the Primary PAN is the main culprit here.
MA
Marylin 1 year ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with D. If all the nodes are actively being synced, that could definitely cause the button to be grayed out. Gotta keep that data consistent!
RO
Rodolfo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marylin
B) One of the nodes is the Primary PAN
AN
Annice 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marylin
A) One of the nodes is an active PSN.
JO
Jose 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure it's C. All the nodes participating in the PAN auto failover would prevent you from deregistering them. Gotta keep that high availability, you know?
ST
Stevie 1 year ago
But what about option A) One of the nodes is an active PSN? Could that also be causing the issue?
KR
Kristofer 1 year ago
I agree with Jenise, because the Primary PAN is responsible for managing the configuration and policies for the entire deployment.
LA
Latricia 1 year ago
Hmm, I think the answer is B. If the node is the Primary PAN, you can't deregister it. That makes sense, right?
AU
Audry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Latricia
B) One of the nodes is the Primary PAN
OL
Oliva 1 year ago
↳ replying to Latricia
A) One of the nodes is an active PSN.
JE
Jenise 1 year ago
I think the answer is B) One of the nodes is the Primary PAN.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel