Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-710 Exam - Topic 5 Question 51 Discussion

An engineer wants to add an additional Cisco FTD Version 6.2.3 device to their current 6.2.3 deployment to create a high availability pair.The currently deployed Cisco FTD device is using local management and identical hardware including the available port density to enable the failover and stateful links required in a proper high availability deployment. Which action ensures that the environment is ready to pair the new Cisco FTD with the old one?
A) Change from Cisco FDM management to Cisco FMC management on both devices and register them to FMC.
B) Ensure that the two devices are assigned IP addresses from the 169 254.0.0/16 range for failover interfaces.
C) Factory reset the current Cisco FTD so that it can synchronize configurations with the new Cisco FTD device.
D) Ensure that the configured DNS servers match on the two devices for name resolution.

Cisco 300-710 Exam - Topic 5 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-710 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 5
[All 300-710 Questions]

An engineer wants to add an additional Cisco FTD Version 6.2.3 device to their current 6.2.3 deployment to create a high availability pair.

The currently deployed Cisco FTD device is using local management and identical hardware including the available port density to enable the failover and stateful links required in a proper high availability deployment. Which action ensures that the environment is ready to pair the new Cisco FTD with the old one?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Frederica at May 31, 2022, 01:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-710 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Devorah
10 months ago
Wait, are we really using 169.254.x.x for failover? That seems odd!
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
10 months ago
D is a good point, but not the main priority here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
10 months ago
C sounds risky, why factory reset?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
11 months ago
I think B is more important for failover interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
11 months ago
A is definitely the way to go for FMC management!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
11 months ago
I practiced a question about synchronizing configurations, and I feel like factory resetting the current device might not be necessary. Option C seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
11 months ago
I think the failover interfaces need to be on a specific subnet, but I can't recall if 169.254.0.0/16 is the right one. It seems familiar though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
11 months ago
I remember studying that for high availability, both devices need to be managed the same way, so option A sounds right, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
11 months ago
Matching DNS servers is important for name resolution, but I don't think it directly impacts the high availability setup. Option D might not be the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Azure Policy seems like the obvious choice, but I want to double-check the other options just to be sure I'm not missing something.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel