MENU
An engineer wants to add an additional Cisco FTD Version 6.2.3 device to their current 6.2.3 deployment to create a high availability pair.
The currently deployed Cisco FTD device is using local management and identical hardware including the available port density to enable the failover and stateful links required in a proper high availability deployment. Which action ensures that the environment is ready to pair the new Cisco FTD with the old one?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 300-710 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
10 comments · newest first
DE
Devorah
11 months ago
Wait, are we really using 169.254.x.x for failover? That seems odd!
BU
Buck
12 months ago
D is a good point, but not the main priority here.
DO
Dominga
12 months ago
C sounds risky, why factory reset?
LI
Lisha
1 year ago
I think B is more important for failover interfaces.
TW
Twana
1 year ago
A is definitely the way to go for FMC management!
MA
Marta
1 year ago
I practiced a question about synchronizing configurations, and I feel like factory resetting the current device might not be necessary. Option C seems risky.
EM
Emiko
1 year ago
I think the failover interfaces need to be on a specific subnet, but I can't recall if 169.254.0.0/16 is the right one. It seems familiar though.
EL
Elise
1 year ago
I remember studying that for high availability, both devices need to be managed the same way, so option A sounds right, but I'm not completely sure.
SH
Shawnna
1 year ago
Matching DNS servers is important for name resolution, but I don't think it directly impacts the high availability setup. Option D might not be the best choice here.
RE
Regenia
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Azure Policy seems like the obvious choice, but I want to double-check the other options just to be sure I'm not missing something.