MENU
What is the result when two users modify a VPN policy at the same lime on a Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center managed device?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 300-710 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
In Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC), when two users attempt to modify a VPN policy simultaneously, the system implements a locking mechanism to prevent conflicts. The first user who selects edit on the policy locks the configuration, preventing other users from making changes until the lock is released.
Steps:
When the first user selects edit on the VPN policy, FMC locks the policy for editing.
The lock ensures that only the first user can make changes.
Once the first user saves or cancels their changes, the lock is released.
Other users can then edit the policy.
This locking mechanism ensures that configuration conflicts are avoided and only one set of changes is applied at a time.
27 comments · newest first
GL
Glory
11 months ago
Definitely prevents multiple edits, that's how it works!
GL
Glenn
11 months ago
Wait, can multiple users really edit at the same time?
ES
Estrella
11 months ago
I heard they merge changes sometimes?
BE
Beckie
11 months ago
No way, the first user locks it!
GL
Gladis
12 months ago
I think the last saved configuration wins.
TA
Talia
12 months ago
I believe the system should prevent multiple users from making changes at the same time, so I’m leaning towards D.
CL
Cletus
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought changes could be merged, but that seems risky. Is C really a possibility?
ME
Melda
1 year ago
I feel like I saw a question similar to this in our practice tests, and it mentioned something about locking the configuration. Could it be B?
JE
Jeanice
1 year ago
I think I remember something about how the last saved configuration takes precedence, so maybe it's A? But I'm not entirely sure.
BE
Beata
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is B - the first user who selects edit on the policy will lock the configuration, preventing the other user from making changes. I'll mark that one and move on.
WH
Whitley
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that the system prevents modifications to the policy by multiple users, so option D is the correct answer. I'll make sure to double-check my understanding before submitting.
LE
Leota
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the options here. I'll need to review the Cisco documentation on policy management to understand the expected behavior when multiple users try to edit at the same time.
CA
Carisa
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky question about managing VPN policies on a Cisco Secure Firewall. I'll need to think carefully about the different scenarios and how the system handles concurrent edits.
CO
Cortney
1 year ago
A withdrawal design could work too, but I'm worried that completely removing the intervention might cause the hand flapping to return and be difficult to manage.
DE
Dean
2 years ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of collaborative editing. I'm betting on B - the first user locks the configuration to maintain control. Gotta love that Cisco efficiency!
GL
Glendora
2 years ago
User 3: Agreed, Cisco knows how to handle collaborative editing efficiently.
LU
Luis
2 years ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to maintain control.
SH
Sharen
2 years ago
I think B is correct, the first user locks the configuration.
DA
Daren
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the Cisco engineers were hoping to avoid the 'too many cooks in the kitchen' problem with this one. Gotta go with D for sure.
ED
Edna
2 years ago
Wait, what if they both try to edit at the same time and the system just explodes? That would be a real plot twist!
CH
Christa
2 years ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is D. The system should prevent modifications to the policy by multiple users to avoid conflicts and ensure consistency.
ZA
Zack
2 years ago
It's important for security reasons to have a system in place that prevents simultaneous modifications by multiple users.
JU
Justine
2 years ago
Yes, that's correct. It helps avoid conflicts and maintain consistency in the policy configuration.
HE
Hector
2 years ago
I think you're right. The system should prevent multiple users from modifying the policy at the same time.
ER
Erin
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think the system prevents modifications by multiple users.
KE
Kelvin
2 years ago
I believe the changes from both users will be merged together.
DE
Denise
2 years ago
I think the first user locks the configuration.