Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-710 Exam - Topic 11 Question 96 Discussion

What is the result when two users modify a VPN policy at the same lime on a Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center managed device?
B) The first user locks the configuration when selecting edit on the policy.
A) Both users can edit the policy arid the last saved configuration persists.
C) The changes from both users will be merged together into the policy.
D) The system prevents modifications to the policy by multiple users.

Cisco 300-710 Exam - Topic 11 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-710 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 11
[All 300-710 Questions]

What is the result when two users modify a VPN policy at the same lime on a Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center managed device?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

In Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC), when two users attempt to modify a VPN policy simultaneously, the system implements a locking mechanism to prevent conflicts. The first user who selects edit on the policy locks the configuration, preventing other users from making changes until the lock is released.

Steps:

When the first user selects edit on the VPN policy, FMC locks the policy for editing.

The lock ensures that only the first user can make changes.

Once the first user saves or cancels their changes, the lock is released.

Other users can then edit the policy.

This locking mechanism ensures that configuration conflicts are avoided and only one set of changes is applied at a time.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Glory
9 months ago
Definitely prevents multiple edits, that's how it works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
9 months ago
Wait, can multiple users really edit at the same time?
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
10 months ago
I heard they merge changes sometimes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
10 months ago
No way, the first user locks it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
10 months ago
I think the last saved configuration wins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
10 months ago
I believe the system should prevent multiple users from making changes at the same time, so I’m leaning towards D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought changes could be merged, but that seems risky. Is C really a possibility?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
11 months ago
I feel like I saw a question similar to this in our practice tests, and it mentioned something about locking the configuration. Could it be B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
11 months ago
I think I remember something about how the last saved configuration takes precedence, so maybe it's A? But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is B - the first user who selects edit on the policy will lock the configuration, preventing the other user from making changes. I'll mark that one and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is that the system prevents modifications to the policy by multiple users, so option D is the correct answer. I'll make sure to double-check my understanding before submitting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the options here. I'll need to review the Cisco documentation on policy management to understand the expected behavior when multiple users try to edit at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky question about managing VPN policies on a Cisco Secure Firewall. I'll need to think carefully about the different scenarios and how the system handles concurrent edits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
11 months ago
A withdrawal design could work too, but I'm worried that completely removing the intervention might cause the hand flapping to return and be difficult to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
2 years ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of collaborative editing. I'm betting on B - the first user locks the configuration to maintain control. Gotta love that Cisco efficiency!
upvoted 0 times
Glendora
2 years ago
User 3: Agreed, Cisco knows how to handle collaborative editing efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 years ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to maintain control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
2 years ago
I think B is correct, the first user locks the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daren
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the Cisco engineers were hoping to avoid the 'too many cooks in the kitchen' problem with this one. Gotta go with D for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
2 years ago
Wait, what if they both try to edit at the same time and the system just explodes? That would be a real plot twist!
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
2 years ago
I'm pretty sure the correct answer is D. The system should prevent modifications to the policy by multiple users to avoid conflicts and ensure consistency.
upvoted 0 times
Zack
2 years ago
It's important for security reasons to have a system in place that prevents simultaneous modifications by multiple users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
2 years ago
Yes, that's correct. It helps avoid conflicts and maintain consistency in the policy configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
2 years ago
I think you're right. The system should prevent multiple users from modifying the policy at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erin
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think the system prevents modifications by multiple users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
2 years ago
I believe the changes from both users will be merged together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
2 years ago
I think the first user locks the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel