MENU
An engineer must investigate a connectivity issue and decides to use the packet capture feature on Cisco FTD. The goal is to see the real packet going through the Cisco FTD device and see the Snort detection actions as a part of the output. After the capture-traffic command is issued, only the packets are displayed. Which action resolves this issue?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 300-710 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
15 comments · newest first
MO
Moira
1 month ago
B is solid. Capturing with trace can clarify the issue.
DO
Dorathy
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards A. More info is always better in troubleshooting.
GO
Goldie
2 months ago
D seems less efficient. GUI can be slow for this task.
PE
Pete
2 months ago
I feel like option C could work. The -T option might show more.
SH
Shawnda
2 months ago
I agree, but option B sounds good too. Trace option is useful.
IN
Inocencia
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Verbose gives more details.
RO
Rodolfo
2 months ago
D seems like a hassle, just do it in CLI!
EL
Ellen
3 months ago
Wait, why isn’t the trace showing up by default?
LA
Lavera
3 months ago
C) I thought D was the way to go, but I guess not?
MA
Mariann
3 months ago
B) That’s the right move, definitely!
SU
Sueann
3 months ago
A) Use the verbose option for more details.
CH
Chau
3 months ago
I vaguely recall that using the FMC GUI might give more insights, but I’m not confident if that’s the best choice here.
GA
Gail
3 months ago
I feel like the trace option was mentioned in one of our labs. Could it be option B?
WA
Walker
4 months ago
I think I practiced a question like this where we had to specify options for packet captures. Maybe the verbose option is what we need here?
IS
Isreal
4 months ago
I remember something about needing to see more than just the packets, but I'm not sure which command adds that detail.