Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 300-630 Topic 6 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-630 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 6
[All 300-630 Questions]

What is a design implication for Cisco ACI using an application-centric approach?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Using an application-centric approach in Cisco ACI means that multiple VLANs and/or multiple EPGs can be grouped under one bridge domain. This approach aligns network constructs with application requirements, enabling more efficient and flexible network configurations.


by Hollis at Apr 03, 2025, 05:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-630 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Serina
2 months ago
I'm going with option C. It seems more scalable to have one EPG mapped to multiple bridge domains, especially in complex networks.
upvoted 0 times
Shelia
9 days ago
One VLAN equaling one EPG equaling one bridge domain simplifies the setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
10 days ago
Having VLAN numbers in the names of bridge domain and EPG objects can help with organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
12 days ago
I think having multiple VLANs and EPGs under one bridge domain is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
28 days ago
Option C is a good choice for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lezlie
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Keeping the VLAN numbers in the object names makes it easier to keep track of everything.
upvoted 0 times
Kindra
22 days ago
I find it much easier to troubleshoot and make changes when everything is clearly labeled with VLAN numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
1 months ago
It's important to have a clear naming convention for better management of the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
2 months ago
I agree, having VLAN numbers in the names of the objects definitely helps with organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sang
3 months ago
Ha! I bet the engineers at Cisco had a field day coming up with these fancy terms. 'EPG' and 'bridge domain' - sounds like they're playing a game of Scrabble.
upvoted 0 times
Laurene
2 months ago
C) One EPG is mapped to multiple bridge domains
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
2 months ago
B) VLAN numbers are in the names of the bridge domain and EPG objects
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
2 months ago
A) Multiple VLANs and/or multiple EPGs are under one bridge domain
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Serina
3 months ago
Hmm, that's an interesting perspective. I can see how that would simplify the design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it is D) One VLAN equals one EPG equals one bridge domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A seems more intuitive to me. Multiple VLANs and EPGs under one bridge domain seems like a more flexible approach.
upvoted 0 times
Nakita
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Having everything under one bridge domain makes it easier to manage and scale.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
2 months ago
User 1: I think option A is the way to go. It allows for more flexibility with multiple VLANs and EPGs under one bridge domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mariann
3 months ago
I think option D is the correct answer. It makes the most sense to have a one-to-one mapping between VLAN, EPG, and bridge domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
4 months ago
I think the design implication is A) Multiple VLANs and/or multiple EPGs are under one bridge domain.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel