Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-620 Exam - Topic 5 Question 90 Discussion

An engineer configures a Cisco ACI Multi-Pod for disaster recovery. Which action should be taken for the new nodes to be discoverable by the existing Cisco APICs?
A) Configure IGMPv3 on the interfaces of IPN routers that face the Cisco ACI spine.
B) Enable subinterfaces with dot1q tagging on all links between the IPN routers.
C) Enable DHCP relay on all links that are connected to Cisco ACI spines on IPN devices.
D) Configure BGP as the underlay protocol in IPN.

Cisco 300-620 Exam - Topic 5 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-620 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 5
[All 300-620 Questions]

An engineer configures a Cisco ACI Multi-Pod for disaster recovery. Which action should be taken for the new nodes to be discoverable by the existing Cisco APICs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Larae at Dec 11, 2024, 06:55 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-620 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nu
9 months ago
I’m not sure about DHCP relay being necessary here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
9 months ago
Subinterfaces with dot1q tagging are a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
10 months ago
Wait, isn't IGMPv3 more for multicast?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
10 months ago
Totally agree, B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
10 months ago
I think BGP is essential for the underlay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
10 months ago
I vaguely recall something about DHCP relay, but I can't remember if it directly affects node discovery. This one's tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vannessa
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where enabling subinterfaces was key for link configurations. Maybe option B is worth considering?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like IGMPv3 was mentioned in relation to multicast traffic. Could that be relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
11 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of BGP in the underlay for Multi-Pod setups, so I think option D might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
11 months ago
I'm fairly confident that the correct answer is option B, enabling subinterfaces with dot1q tagging on the links between the IPN routers. This should ensure the proper VLAN configuration for the new nodes to be discovered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
11 months ago
Okay, based on my understanding, the key here is to enable the proper connectivity and protocols between the IPN routers and Cisco ACI spine. I think option C, enabling DHCP relay, is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the specifics of how the new nodes should be discoverable by the existing APICs. I'll need to review the Cisco ACI documentation to make sure I understand the correct approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to think through the Cisco ACI Multi-Pod configuration and disaster recovery process to determine the right action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
2 years ago
Ah, the old Cisco ACI Multi-Pod conundrum. I'd say option D is the way to go, but I'm still trying to figure out how to make my toaster work with it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Isn't enabling subinterfaces with dot1q tagging on all links between the IPN routers a common practice for Cisco ACI Multi-Pod setups? Option B might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Willis
2 years ago
I agree, Option B might be the way to go for the new nodes to be discoverable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
2 years ago
Yeah, that sounds like a common practice for Cisco ACI Multi-Pod setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
2 years ago
I think enabling subinterfaces with dot1q tagging on all links between the IPN routers is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nieves
2 years ago
Configuring IGMPv3 on the IPN routers? That's a bit like trying to catch a fish with a baseball bat. Option A doesn't sound right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
2 years ago
Option C seems more logical to me. Enabling DHCP relay on the links connected to the Cisco ACI spines will ensure the new nodes can obtain the necessary configuration details.
upvoted 0 times
Garry
2 years ago
That makes sense. DHCP relay can help in distributing the necessary information for the new nodes to be discoverable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
2 years ago
Enabling DHCP relay on the links connected to the Cisco ACI spines will ensure the new nodes can obtain the necessary configuration details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
2 years ago
Option C seems more logical to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dalene
2 years ago
I think B) Enable subinterfaces with dot1q tagging on all links between the IPN routers makes the most sense for discoverability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
2 years ago
I think option D is the correct answer. Configuring BGP as the underlay protocol in the IPN will allow the new nodes to be discovered by the existing APICs.
upvoted 0 times
Marilynn
2 years ago
I think we should go with option A, configuring IGMPv3 on the interfaces of IPN routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
2 years ago
I agree, option D is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashandra
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think enabling DHCP relay on all links connected to Cisco ACI spines could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Configure BGP as the underlay protocol in IPN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Configure IGMPv3 on the interfaces of IPN routers that face the Cisco ACI spine.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel