Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-620 Exam - Topic 5 Question 90 Discussion

Posted by Larae on Dec 11, 2024 at 06:55 AM

An engineer configures a Cisco ACI Multi-Pod for disaster recovery. Which action should be taken for the new nodes to be discoverable by the existing Cisco APICs?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium 300-620 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
NU
Nu 11 months ago
I’m not sure about DHCP relay being necessary here.
MA
Malcolm 11 months ago
Subinterfaces with dot1q tagging are a must!
NO
Noble 11 months ago
Wait, isn't IGMPv3 more for multicast?
AL
Alpha 11 months ago
Totally agree, B is the way to go!
AR
Arthur 12 months ago
I think BGP is essential for the underlay.
KE
Keneth 12 months ago
I vaguely recall something about DHCP relay, but I can't remember if it directly affects node discovery. This one's tricky!
VA
Vannessa 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where enabling subinterfaces was key for link configurations. Maybe option B is worth considering?
VA
Vallie 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like IGMPv3 was mentioned in relation to multicast traffic. Could that be relevant here?
ST
Stephanie 1 year ago
I remember discussing the importance of BGP in the underlay for Multi-Pod setups, so I think option D might be the right choice.
OR
Oretha 1 year ago
I'm fairly confident that the correct answer is option B, enabling subinterfaces with dot1q tagging on the links between the IPN routers. This should ensure the proper VLAN configuration for the new nodes to be discovered.
SH
Shawn 1 year ago
Okay, based on my understanding, the key here is to enable the proper connectivity and protocols between the IPN routers and Cisco ACI spine. I think option C, enabling DHCP relay, is the way to go.
DO
Dottie 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the specifics of how the new nodes should be discoverable by the existing APICs. I'll need to review the Cisco ACI documentation to make sure I understand the correct approach.
CA
Carol 1 year ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to think through the Cisco ACI Multi-Pod configuration and disaster recovery process to determine the right action.
LA
Lashanda 2 years ago
Ah, the old Cisco ACI Multi-Pod conundrum. I'd say option D is the way to go, but I'm still trying to figure out how to make my toaster work with it.
AL
Alona 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Isn't enabling subinterfaces with dot1q tagging on all links between the IPN routers a common practice for Cisco ACI Multi-Pod setups? Option B might be the way to go.
WI
Willis 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alona
I agree, Option B might be the way to go for the new nodes to be discoverable.
KE
Keneth 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alona
Yeah, that sounds like a common practice for Cisco ACI Multi-Pod setups.
TW
Twila 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alona
I think enabling subinterfaces with dot1q tagging on all links between the IPN routers is a good idea.
NI
Nieves 2 years ago
Configuring IGMPv3 on the IPN routers? That's a bit like trying to catch a fish with a baseball bat. Option A doesn't sound right to me.
RE
Refugia 2 years ago
Option C seems more logical to me. Enabling DHCP relay on the links connected to the Cisco ACI spines will ensure the new nodes can obtain the necessary configuration details.
GA
Garry 2 years ago
↳ replying to Refugia
That makes sense. DHCP relay can help in distributing the necessary information for the new nodes to be discoverable.
RY
Ryan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Refugia
Enabling DHCP relay on the links connected to the Cisco ACI spines will ensure the new nodes can obtain the necessary configuration details.
RO
Rolf 2 years ago
↳ replying to Refugia
Option C seems more logical to me.
DA
Dalene 2 years ago
I think B) Enable subinterfaces with dot1q tagging on all links between the IPN routers makes the most sense for discoverability.
ME
Melinda 2 years ago
I think option D is the correct answer. Configuring BGP as the underlay protocol in the IPN will allow the new nodes to be discovered by the existing APICs.
MA
Marilynn 2 years ago
↳ replying to Melinda
I think we should go with option A, configuring IGMPv3 on the interfaces of IPN routers.
AL
Alyce 2 years ago
↳ replying to Melinda
I agree, option D is the best choice for this scenario.
LA
Lashandra 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think enabling DHCP relay on all links connected to Cisco ACI spines could also work.
TH
Thora 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Configure BGP as the underlay protocol in IPN.
DA
Daren 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Configure IGMPv3 on the interfaces of IPN routers that face the Cisco ACI spine.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel