Discuss Cisco 300-620 Exam Topic 2 Question 82

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. The Cisco ACI fabric has an egress L3Out from Leaf-101 and Leaf-102 to CORE-1. VLAN 102 is used to form the OSPF adjacency. The workloads must be migrated into EPG-101, and the static port binding is configured to Leaf-103 e1/1 with encap VLAN 101. An engineer completes the port binding and receives an MCP fault. Which action clears the fault?

AUse VLAN 101 for OSPF adjacency on the egress L3Out.

BUse VLAN 102 as the encap VLAN on the EPG-101 static port binding.

CAdd VLAN 102 to the VLAN pool that is used by the static port binding.

DPrune VLAN 101 from the VLAN pool that is used by the egress L3Out.

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium 300-620 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

36 comments · newest first

Arlette 11 months ago

I’m not sure, pruning VLAN 101 could mess things up.

Glory 11 months ago

Adding VLAN 102 to the pool sounds like a solid move.

Colton 11 months ago

Wait, why would we use VLAN 101 for OSPF?

Truman 11 months ago

Totally agree, option B seems right!

Vilma 12 months ago

VLAN 102 is for OSPF adjacency.

Alecia 12 months ago

I think pruning VLAN 101 could help, but I’m not entirely sure if that would clear the fault. It seems like it might be a workaround rather than a solution.

Cristy 1 year ago

I’m a bit confused about the MCP fault. I thought it was related to mismatched VLANs, but I can't recall which option directly addresses that.

Mollie 1 year ago

This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to adjust VLANs for EPGs. I think using VLAN 102 for the port binding might be the right move.

Honey 1 year ago

I remember something about VLANs needing to match for OSPF adjacencies, but I'm not sure if that means we should change the VLAN for the adjacency or the port binding.

Yen 1 year ago

I'm a bit confused here. The question mentions migrating workloads into EPG-101, but the port binding is to Leaf-103. How does that fit together? I'll need to re-read this a few times to make sure I understand the full scenario.

Markus 1 year ago

Okay, I think I've got it. The VLAN 102 is used for the OSPF adjacency, so we need to use that same VLAN for the static port binding to clear the fault. Option B looks like the right answer.

Brendan 1 year ago

This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the details about the VLAN usage and port binding to figure out the right solution.

Hyun 1 year ago

Hmm, the question mentions an MCP fault, so I'm guessing the key is to match the VLAN used for the OSPF adjacency with the VLAN used for the static port binding. Let me think this through step-by-step.

Artie 1 year ago

Hmm, the high count being higher than the current capacity is an interesting clue. I'm thinking either the pool size was increased, or the workload was higher in the past. I'll need to weigh the options carefully.

Melita 2 years ago

I'm feeling lucky today, so I'm going to go with the wild card option E: Buy a lottery ticket. That's the only way this question is going to make sense to me.

Bernardo 2 years ago

Option A is just absurd. Using VLAN 101 for OSPF adjacency when the static port binding is using VLAN 101? That's a recipe for disaster. I'll stick with D, thanks.

Blythe 2 years ago

↳ replying to Bernardo

Exactly, let's go with option D to resolve the MCP fault.

Katie 2 years ago

↳ replying to Bernardo

That way the fault should clear up and the migration can proceed smoothly.

Rebbecca 2 years ago

↳ replying to Bernardo

Yeah, it's best to stick with option D and prune VLAN 101 from the VLAN pool.

Caprice 2 years ago

↳ replying to Bernardo

I agree, using VLAN 101 for OSPF adjacency would definitely cause issues.

Providencia 2 years ago

I see your point, but I still think D) Prune VLAN 101 from the VLAN pool is the best option to clear the fault.

Jules 2 years ago

But if we add VLAN 102 to the VLAN pool, that might also clear the fault, so C) could be the answer.

Aleta 2 years ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Use VLAN 102 as the encap VLAN on the EPG-101 static port binding.

Cary 2 years ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with B. Use VLAN 102 as the encap VLAN on the EPG-101 static port binding. Seems like the simplest solution to me.

Elbert 2 years ago

The answer is C. Add VLAN 102 to the VLAN pool used by the static port binding. This way, the VLAN used for the OSPF adjacency and the VLAN used for the static port binding will be the same, resolving the MCP fault.

My 2 years ago

↳ replying to Elbert

No, the correct answer is C. We need to add VLAN 102 to the VLAN pool used by the static port binding.

Joye 2 years ago

↳ replying to Elbert

I think the answer is A. We should use VLAN 101 for OSPF adjacency on the egress L3Out.

Jules 2 years ago

I think the answer is A) Use VLAN 101 for OSPF adjacency on the egress L3Out.

Carman 2 years ago

I think the answer is D. Prune VLAN 101 from the VLAN pool used by the egress L3Out. This should clear the MCP fault since the VLAN used for the static port binding needs to be different from the VLAN used for the OSPF adjacency.

Jutta 2 years ago

↳ replying to Carman

Agreed. It's important to have separate VLANs for different purposes in the network.

Quentin 2 years ago

↳ replying to Carman

D) Prune VLAN 101 from the VLAN pool that is used by the egress L3Out.

Suzi 2 years ago

↳ replying to Carman

C) Add VLAN 102 to the VLAN pool that is used by the static port binding.

Wendell 2 years ago

↳ replying to Carman

That makes sense. Pruning VLAN 101 should resolve the issue.

Rusty 2 years ago

↳ replying to Carman

B) Use VLAN 102 as the encap VLAN on the EPG-101 static port binding.

Evangelina 2 years ago

↳ replying to Carman

I think the answer is D.

Arlette 2 years ago

↳ replying to Carman

A) Use VLAN 101 for OSPF adjacency on the egress L3Out.

Cisco 300-620 Exam - Topic 2 Question 82 Discussion