Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-620 Exam - Topic 1 Question 94 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit. VM1 and VM2 are in Cisco ACI POD1 and communication takes place. Which event is triggered when VM2 is live migrated from POD1 to POD2?
B) Leaf 201 creates a tunnel with leaf 102 because of the bounced traffic that is destined to VM2.
A) Leaf 102 installs a bounce entry for VM2 pointing to the PTEP address of leaf 201.
C) Spines from POD2 send an MP-BGP EVPN update to the leaves in POD1 about the new location of VM2.
D) An MP-BGP EVPN update is received by spines in POD1 announcing the reachability of VM2 via the proxy VTEP address of the spines in POD2.

Cisco 300-620 Exam - Topic 1 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-620 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 1
[All 300-620 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit. VM1 and VM2 are in Cisco ACI POD1 and communication takes place. Which event is triggered when VM2 is live migrated from POD1 to POD2?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Charlene at Mar 04, 2025, 09:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-620 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Antonio
9 months ago
Not sure about that, seems like a lot of steps for a migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
9 months ago
Definitely A, that's how it works in ACI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
10 months ago
Surprised that the proxy VTEP address is involved in this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
10 months ago
I think it's actually the spines sending the MP-BGP update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
10 months ago
Leaf 201 creates a tunnel with leaf 102 for the migrated VM.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
10 months ago
I remember we discussed how spines communicate updates, so D seems plausible, but I need to double-check the details on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the whole process. I thought Leaf 102 would be involved somehow, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
11 months ago
I feel like I saw a similar question in practice that mentioned something about the proxy VTEP address. Maybe it's D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
11 months ago
I think the answer might be C, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember something about MP-BGP updates during migrations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. When a VM is live migrated, the new location needs to be announced to the rest of the fabric so traffic can be redirected. Option D sounds like the correct answer - the spines in POD2 will send an EVPN update to the POD1 leaves about the new location of VM2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
11 months ago
You know, I think you're right, MikeT. After re-reading the question, Option D does seem to best describe the event that would be triggered when VM2 is migrated to POD2. I'm feeling more confident about this now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
11 months ago
This question seems to be testing my understanding of how Cisco ACI handles VM migration between PODs. I'll need to think through the different events that could be triggered and match them to the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. This question is like trying to herd virtual cats, but I'll go with D just for fun.
upvoted 0 times
Dorothy
1 year ago
User3: I'll choose D just for fun.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
1 year ago
User2: I'll go with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
1 year ago
User1: I think it's A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dannette
1 year ago
Option C seems to make the most sense. The spines in POD2 would send an update to the leaves in POD1 about the new location of VM2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
1 year ago
B looks good to me. The bounced traffic from leaf 102 would trigger the creation of a tunnel between leaf 102 and leaf 201.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
1 year ago
I think the answer is D. The MP-BGP EVPN update from the spines in POD2 would announce the new location of VM2 to the spines in POD1.
upvoted 0 times
Susana
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 year ago
I believe it is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
1 year ago
I agree with you, it's definitely D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
1 year ago
I believe it's actually A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 year ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
1 year ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yun
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Leaf 201 creates a tunnel with leaf 102 because of the bounced traffic that is destined to VM2 makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) An MP-BGP EVPN update is received by spines in POD1 announcing the reachability of VM2 via the proxy VTEP address of the spines in POD2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Leaf 102 installs a bounce entry for VM2 pointing to the PTEP address of leaf 201.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel