MENU
Refer to the exhibit. VM1 and VM2 are in Cisco ACI POD1 and communication takes place. Which event is triggered when VM2 is live migrated from POD1 to POD2?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 300-620 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
28 comments · newest first
AN
Antonio
11 months ago
Not sure about that, seems like a lot of steps for a migration.
MA
Marsha
11 months ago
Definitely A, that's how it works in ACI.
MI
Micah
11 months ago
Surprised that the proxy VTEP address is involved in this!
TA
Tammara
11 months ago
I think it's actually the spines sending the MP-BGP update.
KI
Kirk
12 months ago
Leaf 201 creates a tunnel with leaf 102 for the migrated VM.
KI
King
12 months ago
I remember we discussed how spines communicate updates, so D seems plausible, but I need to double-check the details on that.
RA
Raul
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the whole process. I thought Leaf 102 would be involved somehow, but I can't recall the specifics.
DA
Danilo
1 year ago
I feel like I saw a similar question in practice that mentioned something about the proxy VTEP address. Maybe it's D?
MA
Marti
1 year ago
I think the answer might be C, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember something about MP-BGP updates during migrations.
TH
Theodora
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. When a VM is live migrated, the new location needs to be announced to the rest of the fabric so traffic can be redirected. Option D sounds like the correct answer - the spines in POD2 will send an EVPN update to the POD1 leaves about the new location of VM2.
RI
Rickie
1 year ago
You know, I think you're right, MikeT. After re-reading the question, Option D does seem to best describe the event that would be triggered when VM2 is migrated to POD2. I'm feeling more confident about this now.
AN
Angelo
1 year ago
This question seems to be testing my understanding of how Cisco ACI handles VM migration between PODs. I'll need to think through the different events that could be triggered and match them to the options provided.
SU
Sue
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. This question is like trying to herd virtual cats, but I'll go with D just for fun.
DO
Dorothy
1 year ago
User3: I'll choose D just for fun.
SA
Sabine
1 year ago
User2: I'll go with C.
CR
Craig
1 year ago
User1: I think it's A.
DA
Dannette
2 years ago
Option C seems to make the most sense. The spines in POD2 would send an update to the leaves in POD1 about the new location of VM2.
FA
Fanny
2 years ago
B looks good to me. The bounced traffic from leaf 102 would trigger the creation of a tunnel between leaf 102 and leaf 201.
BO
Bobbye
2 years ago
I think the answer is D. The MP-BGP EVPN update from the spines in POD2 would announce the new location of VM2 to the spines in POD1.
SU
Susana
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be B.
NO
Nobuko
2 years ago
I believe it is A.
CH
Cherry
2 years ago
I agree with you, it's definitely D.
VA
Valentine
2 years ago
I believe it's actually A.
TR
Truman
2 years ago
I think the answer is D.
PA
Pa
2 years ago
I think the answer is D.
YU
Yun
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Leaf 201 creates a tunnel with leaf 102 because of the bounced traffic that is destined to VM2 makes sense.
DO
Dong
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) An MP-BGP EVPN update is received by spines in POD1 announcing the reachability of VM2 via the proxy VTEP address of the spines in POD2.
LA
Lawanda
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Leaf 102 installs a bounce entry for VM2 pointing to the PTEP address of leaf 201.