Refer to the exhibit.

A technician is troubleshooting a connectivity issue and notices that there is no IS-IS adjacency between R1 and R2. What can the technician change to bring the IS-IS adjacency up?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 300-515 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
8 comments · newest first
FR
Francesco
12 months ago
C is a valid choice, but A is more straightforward.
LI
Linwood
12 months ago
Wait, why would you change the overload bit? Seems odd.
MA
Marleen
1 year ago
I think B could work too, but not sure if it's the best option.
SH
Shenika
1 year ago
Definitely A! Changing R2's net address makes sense.
TE
Tenesha
1 year ago
R1 and R2 need to be in the same area for IS-IS adjacency.
SH
Shannon
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a classic make-or-buy decision problem. I'll need to carefully compare the internal and external costs for each component to determine the optimal solution.
CH
Chau
1 year ago
I vaguely recall something about configuring BGP and router-IDs, so maybe A could be the answer? It seems relevant for inter-site communication.
HE
Heike
1 year ago
It feels like it might be around 17.8%, but I'm not completely confident. Did we cover how many times the discount period fits into the year?