MENU
Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibit. The service provider operations team was alerted that hub site traffic from BGP AS 65101 to AS 65201 uses a non-primary path via the R5-R6 link. IBGP peering between R1 and R2 is up. and no fiber failure has been reported on the R2-R3 link The team determined that the traffic flow between 10.10.10.1 and 192.168.30.1 is not considering the R1-R2-R3-R4 path. Which action resolves this issue?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 300-510 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
SU
Susy
11 months ago
Not sure if changing the metric will actually fix this.
RE
Renea
11 months ago
Wait, are we really ignoring the R1-R2-R3-R4 path?
CH
Chauncey
11 months ago
I think option B is the best choice.
VI
Vincent
11 months ago
Definitely need to adjust local-preference for better routing.
AU
Augustine
12 months ago
BGP AS 65101 and AS 65201 are involved here.
CE
Cecil
12 months ago
I feel like adding a metric on R5 could be a valid approach, but I’m not confident if that’s the best way to influence the path selection.
BR
Brynn
1 year ago
I thought setting the local-preference to the default value could be a solution, but I’m unsure if that would really resolve the traffic issue.
RE
Ressie
1 year ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to adjust metrics. I think option A might help, but I can't recall the exact impact of changing the metric.
JE
Jesusa
1 year ago
I remember we discussed local preference in class, but I'm not sure if changing it to 50 on R1 is the right move here.
CH
Chuck
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. It's not clear to me why we would need to change the local-preference on R2 instead of R1. I'll have to re-read the details carefully.
GR
Gracia
1 year ago
Hmm, the question mentions IBGP peering between R1 and R2 is up, so I'm thinking the issue might be with the local-preference settings. Option B seems like the most likely answer.
WE
Weldon
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky BGP routing issue. I'll need to carefully analyze the network topology and BGP configurations to determine the best solution.
DE
Delsie
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The traffic is not using the primary path, R1-R2-R3-R4, so we need to adjust the BGP attributes to make that path more preferred. Option A changing the metric on R1 could work.
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I think I can identify the key benefits of activity-based budgeting compared to the company's current system.
CR
Crista
2 years ago
Wow, this is a tricky one. I'm gonna have to go with option B and change the local-preference on R1. That should do the trick!
DI
Dierdre
2 years ago
I agree, let's go with option B and make that change on R1.
TA
Talia
2 years ago
Yeah, that seems like the most logical solution to the issue with the traffic flow.
SE
Sena
2 years ago
I think option B is the best choice too. Changing the local-preference on R1 makes sense.
JE
Jeniffer
2 years ago
Hmm, that's interesting. I can see your point. Let's discuss further.
ST
Stephanie
2 years ago
I agree with Brigette. Adjusting the local-preference on R1 seems like the most logical solution here. Why mess with the metric when we can just prioritize the preferred path?
BR
Brigette
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure changing the metric attribute on R1 is the right approach. Shouldn't we focus on the local-preference to influence the BGP path selection?
AD
Adrianna
2 years ago
Carmen: That could also be a valid option to consider.
HE
Hermila
2 years ago
User 3: What about setting the local-preference to the default value on R2 for receiving routes?
CA
Carmen
2 years ago
Yeah, that could help influence the BGP path selection.
JO
Johnetta
2 years ago
I think changing the local-preference on R1 might be the way to go.
TA
Tabetha
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Change the local-preference attribute to 50 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.
MI
Ming
2 years ago
The issue seems to be with the R1-R2-R3-R4 path not being considered. I think changing the local-preference attribute on R1 would be the best solution to resolve this.
ME
Mertie
2 years ago
Let's try that solution and see if it resolves the issue with the path not being considered.
AP
Apolonia
2 years ago
That sounds like a good idea. It could help direct the traffic flow correctly.
CA
Carlota
2 years ago
Option B) Change the local-preference attribute to 50 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.
JE
Jeniffer
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Change the metric attribute to 20 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.