Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 9 Question 99 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit. The service provider operations team was alerted that hub site traffic from BGP AS 65101 to AS 65201 uses a non-primary path via the R5-R6 link. IBGP peering between R1 and R2 is up. and no fiber failure has been reported on the R2-R3 link The team determined that the traffic flow between 10.10.10.1 and 192.168.30.1 is not considering the R1-R2-R3-R4 path. Which action resolves this issue?
B) Change the local-preference attribute to 50 with neighbor 10.10 10 5 on R1
A) Change the metric attribute to 20 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.
C) Set the local-preference to the default value with BGP neighbor 10 10.10.3 on R2 for receiving routes.
D) Add metric 5 with BGP neighbor 10.10.10.6 on R5for receiving routes.

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 9 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 9
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. The service provider operations team was alerted that hub site traffic from BGP AS 65101 to AS 65201 uses a non-primary path via the R5-R6 link. IBGP peering between R1 and R2 is up. and no fiber failure has been reported on the R2-R3 link The team determined that the traffic flow between 10.10.10.1 and 192.168.30.1 is not considering the R1-R2-R3-R4 path. Which action resolves this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Sarah at Sep 13, 2024, 12:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Susy
9 months ago
Not sure if changing the metric will actually fix this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
9 months ago
Wait, are we really ignoring the R1-R2-R3-R4 path?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
10 months ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
10 months ago
Definitely need to adjust local-preference for better routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
10 months ago
BGP AS 65101 and AS 65201 are involved here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
10 months ago
I feel like adding a metric on R5 could be a valid approach, but I’m not confident if that’s the best way to influence the path selection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
11 months ago
I thought setting the local-preference to the default value could be a solution, but I’m unsure if that would really resolve the traffic issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
11 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to adjust metrics. I think option A might help, but I can't recall the exact impact of changing the metric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
11 months ago
I remember we discussed local preference in class, but I'm not sure if changing it to 50 on R1 is the right move here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. It's not clear to me why we would need to change the local-preference on R2 instead of R1. I'll have to re-read the details carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
11 months ago
Hmm, the question mentions IBGP peering between R1 and R2 is up, so I'm thinking the issue might be with the local-preference settings. Option B seems like the most likely answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky BGP routing issue. I'll need to carefully analyze the network topology and BGP configurations to determine the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The traffic is not using the primary path, R1-R2-R3-R4, so we need to adjust the BGP attributes to make that path more preferred. Option A changing the metric on R1 could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think I can identify the key benefits of activity-based budgeting compared to the company's current system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
2 years ago
Wow, this is a tricky one. I'm gonna have to go with option B and change the local-preference on R1. That should do the trick!
upvoted 0 times
Dierdre
2 years ago
I agree, let's go with option B and make that change on R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
2 years ago
Yeah, that seems like the most logical solution to the issue with the traffic flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
2 years ago
I think option B is the best choice too. Changing the local-preference on R1 makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeniffer
2 years ago
Hmm, that's interesting. I can see your point. Let's discuss further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
2 years ago
I agree with Brigette. Adjusting the local-preference on R1 seems like the most logical solution here. Why mess with the metric when we can just prioritize the preferred path?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure changing the metric attribute on R1 is the right approach. Shouldn't we focus on the local-preference to influence the BGP path selection?
upvoted 0 times
Adrianna
2 years ago
Carmen: That could also be a valid option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
2 years ago
User 3: What about setting the local-preference to the default value on R2 for receiving routes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
2 years ago
Yeah, that could help influence the BGP path selection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
2 years ago
I think changing the local-preference on R1 might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tabetha
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Change the local-preference attribute to 50 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
2 years ago
The issue seems to be with the R1-R2-R3-R4 path not being considered. I think changing the local-preference attribute on R1 would be the best solution to resolve this.
upvoted 0 times
Mertie
2 years ago
Let's try that solution and see if it resolves the issue with the path not being considered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
2 years ago
That sounds like a good idea. It could help direct the traffic flow correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
2 years ago
Option B) Change the local-preference attribute to 50 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeniffer
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Change the metric attribute to 20 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel