MENU
Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibit. After a recent network implementation project, customer A is performing stress testing to verify network redundancy at the branch office connected to R4. When the link from R2 is shut own as shown, the SLA tracking object fails and the cost of the link between R2 and R4 increases to 100. However, a traceroute operation from a PC in the Branch office shows that traffic to HQ is still routed via R2. Which solution corrects the problem and optimizes traffic flow via R3 without creating operational overhead?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 300-510 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
CE
Celestine
10 months ago
Redistributing routes from BGP to OSPF sounds like a solid plan.
MA
Mabel
10 months ago
Not sure about option D, seems like unnecessary complexity.
EV
Evelynn
10 months ago
I think option C is the best choice here!
WI
Wilburn
11 months ago
OSPF processes on R2 and R3 could help optimize routing.
CA
Carisa
11 months ago
Surprised that traffic still goes through R2 after the link is down.
BU
Buck
11 months ago
Multiarea adjacency sounds familiar, but extending Area 10 might complicate things. I’m not sure if that’s the simplest solution.
DA
Darnell
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to redistribute routes. I wonder if BGP to OSPF redistribution is the right move here.
MI
Miesha
11 months ago
I think the key here is optimizing traffic flow, so maybe the virtual channel option could work? But I'm not entirely confident.
VA
Valentin
12 months ago
I remember something about OSPF processes, but I'm not sure if configuring two on R2 and R3 is the best way to handle this.
RA
Rasheeda
12 months ago
This is a classic OSPF routing challenge. I've seen similar questions before, so I'm feeling confident about this one. I'll carefully evaluate each option and select the solution that best meets the requirements.
VE
Vernell
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The exhibit and problem statement seem straightforward, but the solutions are a bit tricky. I'll need to think it through step-by-step to make sure I select the right answer.
CL
Clarence
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to optimize the traffic flow without introducing additional operational overhead. Based on the information provided, I believe option C is the way to go.
AL
Alyssa
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the options. I'll need to review my OSPF knowledge to understand the differences between the proposed solutions and figure out which one is the most appropriate.
LI
Lisha
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky OSPF routing question. I'll need to carefully analyze the network topology and the problem statement to determine the best solution.
EL
Elliot
2 years ago
Virtual channel? Sounds fancy. I'm sold, D it is. As long as it doesn't require me to juggle more IP addresses, I'm happy.
FR
Franchesca
1 year ago
User 4: Use multiarea adjacency to extend Area 10 to the link between R2 and R3.
AU
Augustine
1 year ago
User 3: Configure two OSPF processes on R2 and R3 and redistribute traffic between them.
AN
Annelle
1 year ago
User 2: Redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF as type E1.
NA
Natalie
1 year ago
User 1: Virtual channel? Sounds fancy. I'm sold, D it is.
DE
Dewitt
2 years ago
Ah, the good old OSPF processes on R2 and R3. Classic networking solution, but I bet it'll work like a charm. A all the way!
BE
Bernardine
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, it should help optimize traffic flow without too much operational overhead.
AS
Ashlee
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, configuring two OSPF processes on R2 and R3 seems like the best solution.
DA
Dahlia
2 years ago
That could work too, but it might create operational overhead. I still think C) is the best option.
RO
Ronald
2 years ago
B looks good to me. Redistributing routes from BGP to OSPF as type E1 should do the trick. Why complicate things when you can just use the existing protocols?
DO
Doyle
1 year ago
True, simplicity is key when it comes to network configurations.
EA
Earleen
1 year ago
That could work too, but I think sticking to existing protocols is less risky.
KR
Kristine
1 year ago
But wouldn't creating a virtual channel from R3 to R4 be a more direct approach?
JO
Josefa
2 years ago
I agree, option B seems like the simplest solution.
DE
Devora
2 years ago
But wouldn't creating a virtual channel from R3 to R4 be a better solution?
FR
Francine
2 years ago
I think C is the way to go. Extending Area 10 to the link between R2 and R3 will ensure the traffic is routed through the redundant path without any issues.
TH
Theron
2 years ago
The answer is clearly D. Creating a virtual channel from R3 to R4 will optimize the traffic flow without any operational overhead. Simple and elegant solution.
AR
Arthur
1 year ago
Actually, I agree with the user comment. Option D, creating a virtual channel from R3 to R4, is the optimal solution for optimizing traffic flow without creating operational overhead.
MA
Marvel
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C. Using multiarea adjacency to extend Area 10 to the link between R2 and R3 makes more sense.
AL
Alison
2 years ago
I think the answer is A. Configuring two OSPF processes on R2 and R3 seems like the best solution.
DA
Dahlia
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Use multiarea adjacency to extend Area 10 to the link between R2 and R3.
DE
Devora
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Configure two OSPF processes on R2 and R3 and redistribute traffic between them.