Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 2 Question 96 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer commissioned Router 1, which connects lo Router 2 and Router 5 Router 1 participates in IS-IS routing with other routers, but it is not used for transit traffic. Traffic from Router 2 to Router 5 is expected to travel via Router 1 but the traffic is travelog via Router 3 and Router 4 Which action reserves this problem?
D) Remove the overload bit on Router 1.
A) Add hello padding on Router 1
B) Remove the hello padding on Router 5
C) Add the overload bit on Router 5

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 2 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 2
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer commissioned Router 1, which connects lo Router 2 and Router 5 Router 1 participates in IS-IS routing with other routers, but it is not used for transit traffic. Traffic from Router 2 to Router 5 is expected to travel via Router 1 but the traffic is travelog via Router 3 and Router 4 Which action reserves this problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Leanna at Sep 18, 2024, 09:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jerry
9 months ago
Not sure about the hello padding options, seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
9 months ago
Wait, why is traffic going through Router 3 and 4 instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
10 months ago
Removing the overload bit on Router 1 could fix it too.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
10 months ago
I think adding the overload bit on Router 5 makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
10 months ago
Router 1 isn't used for transit traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
10 months ago
I think the overload bit on Router 5 might be the key here. If it's set, it could prevent proper routing through Router 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
11 months ago
I feel like I read that hello padding can cause issues, but I can't recall if adding or removing it is the right move for Router 5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
11 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced where we had to adjust the overload bit. I think removing it could help Router 1 participate better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
11 months ago
I remember something about hello padding affecting neighbor relationships, but I'm not sure if it applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
11 months ago
Based on the information provided, it seems like the overload bit on Router 5 might be the issue. I'll try adding the overload bit on Router 5 and see if that resolves the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand the problem and the possible solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The traffic is not using the expected path, so I need to figure out what's causing that and how to fix it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the network topology and the IS-IS routing behavior to determine the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
11 months ago
This seems straightforward. I think the solution is to remove the overload bit on Router 1 to allow the traffic to flow through the expected path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Dr. Alice is encrypting the message and including her digital signature, so Bob would need to use her public key to verify the signature and decrypt the session key. I'll go with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but maybe removing the overload bit on Router 1 could also be a solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
2 years ago
I agree with Mi, adding hello padding on Router 1 could help fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
2 years ago
Hold up, did they just say 'travelog' instead of 'traveling'? I think we need to address the real issue here - the exam question needs a proofreader!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced. Isn't the overload bit used to indicate that a router should not be used for transit traffic? Removing it on Router 1 might not be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
Willetta
2 years ago
Adding hello padding on Router 1 might be the solution to the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
2 years ago
Maybe removing the hello padding on Router 5 could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
2 years ago
I think adding the overload bit on Router 5 could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mi
2 years ago
I think the issue might be with the hello padding on Router 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
2 years ago
I'm not sure about that. Adding the overload bit on Router 5 seems like a more logical solution to me. It would prevent Router 1 from being used for transit traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Stephen
2 years ago
Adding hello padding on Router 1 might also be worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
2 years ago
Removing the overload bit on Router 1 could also help solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
2 years ago
I agree, that would prevent Router 1 from being used for transit traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
2 years ago
I think adding the overload bit on Router 5 is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leota
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is D. Removing the overload bit on Router 1 should resolve the issue and allow traffic to flow as expected.
upvoted 0 times
Mari
2 years ago
I agree, removing the overload bit on Router 1 should fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel