MENU
An engineer is troubleshooting slow performance issues on a customer's network after the last multicast configuration change was applied on it While checking the running configuration on the router the engineer notices there are many ip igmp join-group commands applied on several interfaces of the router which caused the high CPU utilization usage. What action must the engineer take to solve this issue?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 300-510 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
10 comments · newest first
TA
Tarra
11 months ago
Removing unnecessary members could also help, but B is the best option here.
KE
Keneth
12 months ago
A static-group might help too, but B seems more effective.
EN
Enola
12 months ago
Wait, are we sure removing join-group is enough?
VA
Vanna
1 year ago
I agree, B is the way to go!
KA
Kayleigh
1 year ago
Definitely B, too many join-group commands can overload the CPU.
JE
Jeannetta
1 year ago
I wonder if just increasing the query interval would really solve the issue, or if it’s more about cleaning up those join-group commands.
AL
Alysa
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think configuring static groups could also reduce the load on the router.
EL
Elliott
1 year ago
I remember we discussed how too many join-group commands can lead to high CPU usage, so I think removing unnecessary ones might help.
LA
Lashaunda
1 year ago
This question feels familiar; I think we practiced something similar where we had to optimize IGMP configurations.
SL
Slyvia
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Felicia's plan to monitor employees' devices and activities seems pretty extreme. The consultant will likely tell them to reconsider the BYOD policy and stick to company-issued devices instead.