Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 2 Question 51 Discussion

An engineer is troubleshooting slow performance issues on a customer's network after the last multicast configuration change was applied on it While checking the running configuration on the router the engineer notices there are many ip igmp join-group commands applied on several interfaces of the router which caused the high CPU utilization usage. What action must the engineer take to solve this issue?
B) Remove ip igmp join-group command on all unnecessary interfaces
A) Configure ip igmp static-group command on all interfaces
C) Configure all router interfaces to be process-switched by increasing the query interval
D) Remove unnecessary members from the IGMP group

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 2 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 2
[All 300-510 Questions]

An engineer is troubleshooting slow performance issues on a customer's network after the last multicast configuration change was applied on it While checking the running configuration on the router the engineer notices there are many ip igmp join-group commands applied on several interfaces of the router which caused the high CPU utilization usage. What action must the engineer take to solve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Izetta at May 31, 2022, 12:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tarra
10 months ago
Removing unnecessary members could also help, but B is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
10 months ago
A static-group might help too, but B seems more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure removing join-group is enough?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
11 months ago
I agree, B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
11 months ago
Definitely B, too many join-group commands can overload the CPU.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
11 months ago
I wonder if just increasing the query interval would really solve the issue, or if it’s more about cleaning up those join-group commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think configuring static groups could also reduce the load on the router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how too many join-group commands can lead to high CPU usage, so I think removing unnecessary ones might help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
11 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we practiced something similar where we had to optimize IGMP configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Felicia's plan to monitor employees' devices and activities seems pretty extreme. The consultant will likely tell them to reconsider the BYOD policy and stick to company-issued devices instead.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel