Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-435 Exam - Topic 3 Question 71 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit. A Python script is used to configure a Cisco IOS XE router. The Loopback2 interface currently has a description of Management and an IP address/netmask of 10.222.34.22/32. What is the result of executing the script?
A) The interface description remains the same.
B) The router rejects all commands, and the configuration remains the same.
C) The interface is removed from the configuration.
D) The interface description is removed from the configuration.

Cisco 300-435 Exam - Topic 3 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-435 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 3
[All 300-435 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit. A Python script is used to configure a Cisco IOS XE router. The Loopback2 interface currently has a description of Management and an IP address/netmask of 10.222.34.22/32. What is the result of executing the script?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lindsey at Aug 03, 2024, 04:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-435 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Susana
9 months ago
I thought it would just keep the same settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
9 months ago
Wait, are you sure it won't get rejected?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
10 months ago
No way, the script might remove the description!
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
10 months ago
I think the description will stay the same too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
10 months ago
The IP address is a /32, so it won't change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
10 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A because I think the description doesn’t change unless explicitly modified in the script.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
11 months ago
I feel like option D could be right since sometimes scripts overwrite existing descriptions, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
11 months ago
I remember a practice question where the router rejected commands if there was a syntax error, but I can't recall if that's the case here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
11 months ago
I think the description might stay the same, but I'm not entirely sure how the script interacts with existing configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a bit tricky. I'll need to think through the possible outcomes and how the router might respond to the configuration changes. Let me take another look at the question and the exhibit to make sure I understand the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Troy
11 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. The script is modifying the Loopback2 interface, so the question is asking about the result of that change. I'll carefully review the options and select the one that best matches the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
11 months ago
Alright, time to put on my thinking cap. The key here is understanding how the Cisco IOS XE router will handle the configuration commands in the script. I'll need to consider the current state of the interface and the potential impact of the script.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The script is configuring a Cisco router, and the Loopback2 interface has a specific description and IP address. I think I know where this is going, but I'll double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the question and examine the exhibit to determine the correct outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
11 months ago
Identifying the need for multiple Partner Communities by channel seems like it might be the most flexible approach. That way you can tailor the branding and content to each group's specific needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. The options don't seem very straightforward to me. I'll have to read through it a few times to try to understand what's going on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
11 months ago
Limited exemplars sounds kinda familiar. I wonder if that's more about restricting the types of responses instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
2 years ago
Option B is the correct answer. The router will reject the commands because the /32 mask is not a valid configuration for a loopback interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
2 years ago
True, so the answer might be that the interface description remains the same.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
2 years ago
Haha, the engineers must have been on their lunch break when they wrote this script. A /32 on a loopback? Really?
upvoted 0 times
Delpha
2 years ago
Asuncion: I wonder if the script will change it or leave it as is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
2 years ago
Definitely not a common configuration choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
2 years ago
I know right, a /32 on a loopback interface is pretty unusual.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denny
2 years ago
But the question only mentions the interface description, not the IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
2 years ago
I agree, the script should fail because a /32 mask doesn't make sense for a loopback interface. It should be a /32 or higher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
2 years ago
I believe the IP address/netmask will be changed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
2 years ago
The router should reject the commands since a /32 mask is not a valid subnet for a loopback interface.
upvoted 0 times
Lawanda
2 years ago
The interface description remains the same.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
2 years ago
The router rejects all commands, and the configuration remains the same.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denny
2 years ago
I think the script will change the interface description.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel