Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-435 Exam - Topic 2 Question 85 Discussion

What is a difference between OpenConfig and native YANG data models?
A) Native models are developed by vendors and designed to intergrate to features or configurations that are relevant only to that platform.
B) openconfig models are developed by venders and designed to integrate to features or configurations that are relevant only to that platform.
C) Native models are designed to be independent of the underlying platform and are developed by vendors and standards bodies, such as the IETF.
D) Native models are developed by individual developers and designed to apply configurations on platforms.

Cisco 300-435 Exam - Topic 2 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-435 exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 2
[All 300-435 Questions]

What is a difference between OpenConfig and native YANG data models?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Rosalind at Mar 23, 2025, 10:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-435 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lakeesha
9 months ago
I thought OpenConfig was just for certain vendors, not all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
9 months ago
Totally agree, OpenConfig is more standardized!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
9 months ago
Wait, are native models really independent? That sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
9 months ago
Yup, native models are all about the platform!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
9 months ago
Native models are vendor-specific, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the definitions; I thought native models were more flexible, but now I’m not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
10 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think option A sounds right because it emphasizes vendor-specific features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
10 months ago
I think native models are specific to each vendor, but I can't recall if they also include contributions from standards bodies like IETF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
10 months ago
I remember that OpenConfig models are more about standardization across different vendors, but I'm not sure how that compares to native models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the difference - native models are tied to the specific vendor's platform, while OpenConfig models aim to be more universal. I'll explain that clearly in my response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
11 months ago
Okay, from what I recall, native models are developed by the vendors themselves, while OpenConfig models are more of an industry standard. I'll make sure I have that right in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between these two types of models. I'll need to review the details more carefully to make sure I understand it properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
11 months ago
I think the key difference is that native models are vendor-specific, while OpenConfig models are designed to be more platform-independent. I'll focus on understanding that distinction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
1 year ago
Haha, option D is pretty funny. Imagine some random developer just creating their own native models for platforms. That's not how it works!
upvoted 0 times
Mattie
1 year ago
Haha, option D is pretty funny. Imagine some random developer just creating their own native models for platforms. That's not how it works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
1 year ago
C) Native models are designed to be independent of the underlying platform and are developed by vendors and standards bodies, such as the IETF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
1 year ago
A) Native models are developed by vendors and designed to intergrate to features or configurations that are relevant only to that platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Venita
1 year ago
Definitely C. I'm not a big fan of vendor-specific models, they always seem to have limited functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
1 year ago
C sounds like the most logical answer to me. Native models are supposed to be universal, not tied to a particular platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is C. Native models are designed to be platform-independent and developed by vendors and standards bodies, while OpenConfig models are vendor-specific.
upvoted 0 times
Jacob
1 year ago
Native models are developed by vendors and standards bodies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
1 year ago
That's correct, OpenConfig models are vendor-specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
1 year ago
I agree, native models are meant to be platform-independent.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elena
1 year ago
Yes, openconfig models are designed to integrate to features specific to the platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
1 year ago
OpenConfig models are specific to the platform, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
1 year ago
I agree, native models are developed by vendors and standards bodies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
1 year ago
I think the difference is that native models are independent of the platform.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel