MENU
What is a difference between OpenConfig and native YANG data models?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 300-435 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
27 comments · newest first
LA
Lakeesha
10 months ago
I thought OpenConfig was just for certain vendors, not all.
RA
Raina
10 months ago
Totally agree, OpenConfig is more standardized!
JO
Johanna
11 months ago
Wait, are native models really independent? That sounds off.
ST
Stephania
11 months ago
Yup, native models are all about the platform!
MA
Marshall
11 months ago
Native models are vendor-specific, right?
QU
Queenie
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the definitions; I thought native models were more flexible, but now I’m not so sure.
WI
Wilda
11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think option A sounds right because it emphasizes vendor-specific features.
SH
Sherly
12 months ago
I think native models are specific to each vendor, but I can't recall if they also include contributions from standards bodies like IETF.
CA
Carlota
12 months ago
I remember that OpenConfig models are more about standardization across different vendors, but I'm not sure how that compares to native models.
AL
Alana
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident I know the difference - native models are tied to the specific vendor's platform, while OpenConfig models aim to be more universal. I'll explain that clearly in my response.
MA
Malcom
1 year ago
Okay, from what I recall, native models are developed by the vendors themselves, while OpenConfig models are more of an industry standard. I'll make sure I have that right in my answer.
LA
Laurene
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between these two types of models. I'll need to review the details more carefully to make sure I understand it properly.
RE
Rebeca
1 year ago
I think the key difference is that native models are vendor-specific, while OpenConfig models are designed to be more platform-independent. I'll focus on understanding that distinction.
ZI
Zita
2 years ago
Haha, option D is pretty funny. Imagine some random developer just creating their own native models for platforms. That's not how it works!
MA
Mattie
1 year ago
Haha, option D is pretty funny. Imagine some random developer just creating their own native models for platforms. That's not how it works!
BA
Barney
1 year ago
C) Native models are designed to be independent of the underlying platform and are developed by vendors and standards bodies, such as the IETF.
TE
Tequila
1 year ago
A) Native models are developed by vendors and designed to intergrate to features or configurations that are relevant only to that platform.
VE
Venita
2 years ago
Definitely C. I'm not a big fan of vendor-specific models, they always seem to have limited functionality.
PA
Pamella
2 years ago
C sounds like the most logical answer to me. Native models are supposed to be universal, not tied to a particular platform.
CA
Catina
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is C. Native models are designed to be platform-independent and developed by vendors and standards bodies, while OpenConfig models are vendor-specific.
JA
Jacob
1 year ago
Native models are developed by vendors and standards bodies.
QU
Quentin
1 year ago
That's correct, OpenConfig models are vendor-specific.
AF
Afton
2 years ago
I agree, native models are meant to be platform-independent.
EL
Elena
2 years ago
Yes, openconfig models are designed to integrate to features specific to the platform.
WI
Willis
2 years ago
OpenConfig models are specific to the platform, right?
MA
Malcom
2 years ago
I agree, native models are developed by vendors and standards bodies.
EL
Elena
2 years ago
I think the difference is that native models are independent of the platform.