Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-435 Exam - Topic 2 Question 81 Discussion

Which environment must be enabled to complete the zero-touch provisioning process on a IOS XE device?
D) Guest shell
A) TCL
B) ZTP Open Service container
C) EEM

Cisco 300-435 Exam - Topic 2 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-435 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 2
[All 300-435 Questions]

Which environment must be enabled to complete the zero-touch provisioning process on a IOS XE device?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Samira
9 months ago
Yeah, ZTP is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
9 months ago
Wait, is Guest shell really an option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
10 months ago
No way, it's TCL for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
10 months ago
I thought it was EEM?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
10 months ago
It's definitely ZTP Open Service container.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
10 months ago
Guest shell sounds familiar, but I don't think it’s the environment needed for zero-touch provisioning. I might be mixing it up with something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
11 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of TCL in some scenarios, but I don't think it's the right answer for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
11 months ago
I feel like EEM was related to automation, but I can't recall if it’s necessary for zero-touch provisioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
11 months ago
I think it might be ZTP Open Service container, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember it being mentioned in a practice question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
11 months ago
I feel pretty good about B. The question is specifically asking about the environment required for zero-touch provisioning, and the ZTP Open Service container is the most relevant option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
11 months ago
B seems like the most logical choice, but I'm a bit concerned I might be missing something. I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know zero-touch provisioning is all about automating the initial setup, so the environment that enables that process is probably the key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. I'll need to review my notes on zero-touch provisioning to be confident in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
11 months ago
I think the answer is B. The ZTP Open Service container is specifically designed for zero-touch provisioning on IOS XE devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
1 year ago
Guest shell, obviously. What, did you think the IOS XE device was going to do the provisioning itself? Ha!
upvoted 0 times
Margery
1 year ago
D) Guest shell
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
1 year ago
C) EEM
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
1 year ago
B) ZTP Open Service container
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 year ago
A) TCL
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ellsworth
1 year ago
I'm going to have to go with Guest shell on this one. It's the only one that makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
1 year ago
Guest shell, definitely. I mean, who else would be responsible for the zero-touch provisioning process? *scratches head*
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
1 year ago
Yes, Guest shell provides the necessary tools and resources for seamless provisioning process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, Guest shell is the way to go for IOS XE devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
1 year ago
I agree, Guest shell is specifically designed for automating tasks like zero-touch provisioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It's designed for automated provisioning tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
1 year ago
Guest shell is indeed the correct environment for zero-touch provisioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 year ago
User 1: I think Guest shell is the right environment for zero-touch provisioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Talia
1 year ago
Ooh, I remember learning about this in class! I think the correct answer is Guest shell, but don't quote me on that.
upvoted 0 times
Gilberto
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure it's Guest shell that needs to be enabled for zero-touch provisioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
1 year ago
Actually, I think it's EEM that needs to be enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
1 year ago
I believe the correct answer is ZTP Open Service container.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janey
1 year ago
Hmm, I thought it was the ZTP Open Service container, but I could be wrong. This stuff can get pretty technical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure it's Guest shell, that's where the zero-touch provisioning process runs, right?
upvoted 0 times
Ahmad
1 year ago
Definitely. Zero-touch provisioning is all about automation and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
1 year ago
Great idea. It will make the provisioning process much smoother and automated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
1 year ago
That's good to know. I'll make sure to enable Guest shell for the provisioning process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
1 year ago
Yes, you are correct. The zero-touch provisioning process runs in the Guest shell.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
1 year ago
D) Guest shell
upvoted 0 times
...
Elina
1 year ago
C) EEM
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
1 year ago
B) ZTP Open Service container
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
1 year ago
A) TCL
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laurel
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think EEM could also be a possible option for enabling zero-touch provisioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
1 year ago
I agree with Salina, ZTP Open Service container makes sense for zero-touch provisioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
1 year ago
I think the answer is B) ZTP Open Service container.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel