Discuss Cisco 300-435 Exam Topic 1 Question 105

Which statement describe the difference between OpenConfig and native YANG data models?

ANative models are designed to be independent of the underlying platform and are developed by vendors and standards bodies, such as the IETF.

BNative models are developed by individual developers and designed to apply configurations on platforms.

COpenConfig models are developed by vendors and designed to integrate to features or configurations that are relevant only to that platform.

DNative models are developed by vendors and designed to integrate to features or configurations that are relevant only to that platform.

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium 300-435 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

23 comments · newest first

Adolph 2 days ago

I like A too. It emphasizes the independence of native models.

Johnna 7 days ago

C is interesting. OpenConfig aims for broader compatibility.

Emilio 12 days ago

I feel D is misleading. Native models do integrate with platforms.

Merissa 17 days ago

B sounds off. Native models are usually vendor-specific.

Pura 22 days ago

I agree, A makes sense. Vendors need standardization.

Howard 27 days ago

I think A is correct. Native models should be platform-independent.

Loren 1 month ago

D is definitely wrong. Native models are not just vendor-specific.

Janey 1 month ago

I feel B is confusing. Native models have broader applications.

Freeman 1 month ago

Yes, A highlights the independence of native models.

Elvis 2 months ago

OpenConfig is more flexible, right? So A fits better.

Denise 2 months ago

D is misleading. Native models are vendor-specific, not universal.

Stefany 2 months ago

B seems off. Native models aren't just for individual developers.

Theola 2 months ago

I agree, A makes sense. Standards bodies are involved.

Melvin 2 months ago

I think A is correct. Native models are more universal.

Ines 2 months ago

D makes sense, but isn't it a bit confusing with all these models?

Leatha 3 months ago

Wait, I thought OpenConfig was supposed to be more universal?

Demetra 3 months ago

OpenConfig is definitely vendor-specific, so C is misleading.

Theresia 3 months ago

I disagree with B; native models aren't just for individual developers.

Dulce 3 months ago

A) is spot on! Native models are all about vendor independence.

Rutha 3 months ago

If I remember correctly, native models are supposed to be more flexible, but I’m not entirely clear on how that contrasts with OpenConfig.

Ocie 3 months ago

I feel like I’ve seen a question similar to this before, and I think native models are indeed developed by vendors, but I’m confused about the specifics of OpenConfig.

Sommer 4 months ago

I think OpenConfig is more about standardization across platforms, but I can't recall the exact differences in how they are developed.

Hassie 4 months ago

I remember studying that native models are often tied to specific vendors, but I’m not sure if that means they’re always platform-dependent.

Cisco 300-435 Exam - Topic 1 Question 105 Discussion